It's like they'll say what non-sensical shit on twitter just to win internet points without any fucking base in reality.
His post is such a fucking L and self own as their side, the woketards, literally censor and ban mods they disagree with.
I want so badly to get on twitter and reply to these retards but I see the comments and I just don't have the mother's milk for that kind of shit anymore.
They don't know what any words mean beyond "this is positive/negative". That's why they use so many terms in a pejorative sense with no understanding of the greater meaning, associations, or connotations such words have and how they might better describe themselves. A really good example of this is Fascist, one which I believe stems from academic socialists in many years gone by that felt threatened by the initial rise of fascism since it was explicitly born from socialists that were fed up with the ineffectual nature of socialism. AKA Fascism isn't an enemy of socialism, it's a competitor to socialism and that's the threat that socialists are worried about.
It's not so much that they fail to understand what words mean. It's that they choose to ignore traditional definitions and tailor them to suit their needs. They've been doing it for years. Then they repeat the lie so much it becomes the consensus.
I dont think these faggots know what censorship means.
"Our censorship is localisation/updating to global/modern sensibilities/standards. Your local mods are censorship, etc"
It's like they'll say what non-sensical shit on twitter just to win internet points without any fucking base in reality.
His post is such a fucking L and self own as their side, the woketards, literally censor and ban mods they disagree with.
I want so badly to get on twitter and reply to these retards but I see the comments and I just don't have the mother's milk for that kind of shit anymore.
It's all magic spells to them. They only think of words by their connotations and not their actual meanings.
They don't know what any words mean beyond "this is positive/negative". That's why they use so many terms in a pejorative sense with no understanding of the greater meaning, associations, or connotations such words have and how they might better describe themselves. A really good example of this is Fascist, one which I believe stems from academic socialists in many years gone by that felt threatened by the initial rise of fascism since it was explicitly born from socialists that were fed up with the ineffectual nature of socialism. AKA Fascism isn't an enemy of socialism, it's a competitor to socialism and that's the threat that socialists are worried about.
The 14 features of fascism by umberto eco is a comically broad list of items that apply to most healthy nations.
Leftists label anything that is capable of repelling their subversion as “fascism”.
They're dimly aware it's a word their enemies associate with "bad" and not capable of understanding anything beyond that.
It's not so much that they fail to understand what words mean. It's that they choose to ignore traditional definitions and tailor them to suit their needs. They've been doing it for years. Then they repeat the lie so much it becomes the consensus.