Yes, it was. They replaced it with some "opening moves" gimmick where homos, women, and perverts claiming to be women and "nonbinary" can set opening moves, which is a question the person initiating is supposed to answer. That will do do nothing to stop the dynamic from becoming the same as all the other apps. Chad messages "hi" and he's laying pipe 10 minutes later and it's a waste of time for everyone else.
The only other unique thing they offer is that they aren't "dating" only and have the option for "business" and "friends."
I don't think most people even know that these options exist however, so I doubt its providing a large supply to pick from nor is the type of guy/business desperate enough to use it someone you want to interact with.
Maybe if you moved to a new area and really want to find a fishing buddy or something.
Sounds like the same stupid stunt Onlyfans pulled trying to claim it's not just for porn, when that's the first thing everyone assumes it will be if someone states to have an account. Nobody is subbing to an OF account to watch someone cook while clothed when that exists on YouTube and other platforms already, ans probably with fewer clothes!
I know some content creators prefer OnlyFans to Patreon because, well, fuck Patreon, but each and every one of them then needs to spend a few seconds after shilling it to say "and yes, it's just a Patreon substitute, I'm not naked on it, it just is a superior payment platform, despite its reputation."
Extreme psycho perverts have paid to see women not get naked online for decades. Even back when solo girl paysites existed instead of Onlyfans, there were some women who could get away with charging $30/month for basically Instagram shots.
Wasn't that their only competitive distinction?
Now they're just another player competing with a dozen others on what? UI? Farmers Only has more of a value proposition than you do now.
Exactly what I came to ask. Wasn't that...their whole thing?
It's like tumblr getting rid of porn.
Like Reddit getting rid of politics
Yes, it was. They replaced it with some "opening moves" gimmick where homos, women, and perverts claiming to be women and "nonbinary" can set opening moves, which is a question the person initiating is supposed to answer. That will do do nothing to stop the dynamic from becoming the same as all the other apps. Chad messages "hi" and he's laying pipe 10 minutes later and it's a waste of time for everyone else.
The only other unique thing they offer is that they aren't "dating" only and have the option for "business" and "friends."
I don't think most people even know that these options exist however, so I doubt its providing a large supply to pick from nor is the type of guy/business desperate enough to use it someone you want to interact with.
Maybe if you moved to a new area and really want to find a fishing buddy or something.
I've heard of women on apps saying they just want "friends", which is code for beta orbiters. Chad still gets to smash of course.
Well yeah but this wasn't that.
It was straight up guy to guy friendship meeting, or girl to girl I guess. Nothing coded, just odd.
Sounds like the same stupid stunt Onlyfans pulled trying to claim it's not just for porn, when that's the first thing everyone assumes it will be if someone states to have an account. Nobody is subbing to an OF account to watch someone cook while clothed when that exists on YouTube and other platforms already, ans probably with fewer clothes!
I know some content creators prefer OnlyFans to Patreon because, well, fuck Patreon, but each and every one of them then needs to spend a few seconds after shilling it to say "and yes, it's just a Patreon substitute, I'm not naked on it, it just is a superior payment platform, despite its reputation."
Extreme psycho perverts have paid to see women not get naked online for decades. Even back when solo girl paysites existed instead of Onlyfans, there were some women who could get away with charging $30/month for basically Instagram shots.