Sounds like the same stupid stunt Onlyfans pulled trying to claim it's not just for porn, when that's the first thing everyone assumes it will be if someone states to have an account. Nobody is subbing to an OF account to watch someone cook while clothed when that exists on YouTube and other platforms already, ans probably with fewer clothes!
I know some content creators prefer OnlyFans to Patreon because, well, fuck Patreon, but each and every one of them then needs to spend a few seconds after shilling it to say "and yes, it's just a Patreon substitute, I'm not naked on it, it just is a superior payment platform, despite its reputation."
Extreme psycho perverts have paid to see women not get naked online for decades. Even back when solo girl paysites existed instead of Onlyfans, there were some women who could get away with charging $30/month for basically Instagram shots.
Sounds like the same stupid stunt Onlyfans pulled trying to claim it's not just for porn, when that's the first thing everyone assumes it will be if someone states to have an account. Nobody is subbing to an OF account to watch someone cook while clothed when that exists on YouTube and other platforms already, ans probably with fewer clothes!
I know some content creators prefer OnlyFans to Patreon because, well, fuck Patreon, but each and every one of them then needs to spend a few seconds after shilling it to say "and yes, it's just a Patreon substitute, I'm not naked on it, it just is a superior payment platform, despite its reputation."
Extreme psycho perverts have paid to see women not get naked online for decades. Even back when solo girl paysites existed instead of Onlyfans, there were some women who could get away with charging $30/month for basically Instagram shots.