Harvey Weinsteins rape conviction just got overturned.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
It wasn't rape. He is one of the most disgusting human beings and absolutely part of what is wrong with society right now, and I would love to see him burn, but it wasn't rape.
All Actors Are Whores #Aaaw
#sexworkisrealwork
Agreed. He is a slimy piece of shit and it would improve my life immensely if he (and trash like him) would just fuck off permanently but nothing he did was rape. It wasn't even sexual assault. At worst some of it was harassment.
Most of it was either soliciting or regret-after-the-deed (and money/fame was gained).
At the very least, the same people who defended Zoe Quinn have zero room to talk on the issue.
Either trading sexual favors for promotion is okay or it isn't, and if it isn't, then a woman who takes the initiative to use sex to gain an unfair advantage is the spitting definition of a "pickme." Blows my mind how the biggest "pickmes" of them all (whores) have the nerve to call other women pickmes, then again leftist men are the biggest incels and they call other men incels so go figure.
honest question: would it not be culturally, practically, theoretically, in all ways beneficial for us to just say it was rape, considering the very real mindrape hollywood has to force on anyone to get them to have sex with creatures like these?
"this demon roaming the earth is disgusting and deserves death, but his horned friends are right, he is innocent" just muddies the waters, IMO.
No. Look at the list of actresses that came out against him vs the ones who didn't.
Almost every one that did was older, past her prime, and had nothing to lose by pulling this bridge up after her, like Susan Sarandon for example.
Meanwhile you have Jennifer Lawrence who not only said nothing but also just dropped off the fucking map for a few years after this happened because she was no longer being fed roles.
The whole thing was a group of post wall, middle-aged and older women making sure their younger competition wouldn't have the same opportunities as they did, no matter what it might have taken to get the roles. When various male actors came out with their own tales of sexual assault being made against them, like Terry Crews, they were told to shut up and let the women talk, it had nothing to actually do with whatever abuse was going on in Hollywood, certain groups just wanted to retain leverage over others.
I think what this misses is the responsibility of the fame-chasing whores (of both sexes, although my understanding is that this particular pimp was only into women) for accepting the deal.
Exactly. This displaces scrutiny from the actual problem (Hollywood is, and always was, run by degenerates yet we teach our kids to tale lessons from them) to a convinient scapegoat.
so these women were taught to take lessons from the men who later taught them they had to suck dick to get ahead, and this is purely their fault (read: our fault)?
if someone attacks me or my people i don't really care who believed in what and when, i just want to kill the attacker before he can do harm. why is it so hard for people on this forum to think like this without kvetching about how actually the attackers were right to take advantage of some dumb whores (read: our kindred women)?
The real issue is that guys like Weinstein ensure that rather than getting the best actresses, we instead get the actresses who were willing to be used as holes for roles, while the actresses with self-respect and integrity forgo fame and the big bucks in favor of starring in obscure indie films.
Since Weinstein was the gatekeeper, he should be considered primarily responsible, but I don't think of talentless actresses getting multimillion dollar roles that they clearly don't deserve as victims. Had Hollywood been run by men with integrity, no one would know these womens' names.
And if any women could be considered "victims" of this process, it would be the talented women who deserve the big roles but had too much integrity to prostitute themselves for it.
Stop defending the absurdly irresponsible. They aren't victims.
The land is planted thick with man's laws, not god's, and if the devil himself were to appear in that courtroom, I would give him the benefit of the law.
If he is guilty of something, then he is guilty of it. Charge him for propagandizing and psyops against his own peoples. Oh wait, Obama legalized that back in the early 2010s. He broke no laws, he gets no charges. If he broke civil prostitution laws, then fine him for being involved in purchasing a ton of sex, and charge all the hollywood whores who slept with him on the prostitution charges that they are.
If there should be laws against what he has done, then those laws should be made, voted on, approved, and enforced. But what he did was be a John for a bunch of Hollywood prostitutes, not rape.
this is a rather bleak outlook. where does Man get any of his ideas from if not from God?
if you reject God's laws, what prevents the devil from making the very ones you will apply to him later? he is not an idle fellow. if you leave the chess set alone, he will move the pieces in his favor when you're not looking.
there is rape and then there is quid pro quo.
I'm not going to be bias and lie when it is convenient for my side. If I do, I am no better than the people on the left.