I wonder why Little Benny doesn't want people questioning ww2 (This is a New York Times article from 1941)
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Check out the Balfour Declaration; I know that's WW1, but it shows how such conspiracy theories aren't so out there.
Even Wikipedia reads at least in part like antisemitic propaganda.
The Zionist Jews were openly talking about positioning various countries to serve their interests in the world war, and that's just one of many examples. Oh, and it was a literal Rothschild op. I believe they'd earlier promised they could get America into the war to begin with.
You can also check out the article by Churchill called Zionism vs. Bolshevism with quotes like:
"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing."
I know it's far from the primary point but, I'm sorry, that will never not crack me up.
There's comedy bits about how you should never put "the" and "Jews" together. "Jewess" just takes it up a notch. Makes me sort of chortle every time I see it. Anyone who unironically calls someone a Jewess is either extremely based or an absolute retard. There's pretty much no middle ground.
On a more serious note, that is interesting stuff. It really is interesting how overrepresented they are in all that stuff and how, more interesting yet, back in the day, everyone knew it. You were still allowed to talk about it at the time.
And, to be clear, I'm not even blaming all Jews (#NotAllJews) or anything. There is some guilt to be spread around, and there are some troubling things in the ideology that does seem near universal, but you could see, especially back then before they subsumed a lot of the Jewish identity, that it really was a matter of Zionism. It was specifically the Zionist Jews who were doing the subverting, and they were even the ones using their fellow Jews.
It's kind of ironic that it was the Zionists who really conflated Zionism with Judaism, and then try to say you're antisemitic if you're against their evil Zionist agenda. No, you're the ones saying you represent Jews.
IDF out in full force in comments because of how much people see right through benji's bullshit lately lol
You say the New York Times, the newspaper that won the Pulitzer Prize for spreading Nazi war propaganda, was also parroting Japanese propaganda based on nothing more than "another journalist said so"? If you think that's a credible source then do yourself a favour and kill yourself, because your brain damage is clearly getting worse.
Exactly, a worthless leftist rag that parrots propaganda. The funny part is these stormfagging retards dont realise the NYT was founded by de joooz also.
Also? What else is owned by the jooz?
What's this intended to demonstrate? All it shows is that anti-Jew paranoia has been around for a long time, as have crackpots who blame them for every social problem.
It's propaganda issuing from a WW II ally of Germany, the one responsible for the Rape of Nanking and countless other industrial-scale barbarisms, so it's no surprise, but what are we supposed to make of it?
I suppose it may be a sort of test to see where commenters stand on the Jewish Question, as there are plenty of Nazi sympathizers and Jew-haters here who have fallen for the "worldwide Jewish conspiracy" line--a convenient way to simplify complicated questions of evil and a way for those who feel powerless and put upon to adopt a superior moral position.
The relentless massacre of civilians by Israel is another opportunity to cast Jews as an existential evil, so they're not doing themselves any favors by pursuing the total destruction of Ham-Ass, who like to stash their leaders in civilian populations, inviting their slaughter by indiscriminate missiles.
There is no moral high ground in this war that I can see, and it is being used as an excuse to further drain the US Treasury along with the continued burning of dollars in the Ukraine for political aims that are at best confused and at worst extremely cynical, having nothing to do with furthering any interests but those of weapons manufacturing corporations, their shareholders, and those in Congress and the news media who profit from Perpetual War. I suppose many here assume that the latter entities are run and populated by the Jewish Cabal bent on world domination, so you Nazi lovers here have some more ammunition to feed this stupid scapegoating.
I consider the cowards in Congress who voted for more billions to Israel and Ukraine to be war criminals, along with the Ham-ass leadership, Israel's Netanyahu, and the officer corps of the IDF who approve and directly order the massacre of civilians.
You don't need a formal conspiracy when interests converge.
inhales
Hahahahahhahahahahah
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!
xD
paranoia doesn't develop in a vacuum
Oh look the Stormfags are brigading again with irrelevant posts from 100 years ago.
History cannot be irrelevant. Everything happening today is the result of history. Pretending certain parts of it don't matter but other parts of it can never ever be forgotten, even to the point of worship of those events, is only done by dishonest and deceitful people.
I see we found the one who would prefer to ignorantly nrepeat history.
Or perhaps they would prefer that it was you who is ignorant. I wonder why that would be?
What about those inconsistent claims about concentration camps made almost 100 years ago? Are those just as irrelevant now too? Something tells me you don’t find THOSE irrelevant huh?