Also, note the sudden shift? Suddenly, if the people on the top are "privileged," it's because they're smarter. Or something. He's right that trying to break people down for being "too smart" is ridiculous, but it's funny that doesn't apply to "white privilege," but suddenly does if you look too deep at who actually has "white privilege."
Also, they're finally admitting the whole "white privilege" thing is racist bullshit. At least that's good.
Lastly, not sure if you saw my post and it stuck, or we just happened to use the same common phrase, but it's funny that I said just hours ago "white privilege" is and always will be a crock of shit. And, to clarify since text can be weird, I'm not screaming "plagiarism" or anything, I just thought it was interesting.
The new mud golems can't tell the difference between whites and Fellow Whites™, so they're trying to perform damage control before the golems turn on them for the 110th time.
Racial disparities exist. Monolithic racial "privilege" does not. Why do I care if "whites" are overrepresented as CEOs for example (they're not; they're underrepresented), if their policies hate my guts? I am not a CEO, so it doesn't matter to me. Content of character/action, not color of skin. If all CEOs were black, but all policies implemented favored whites, that would be a better argument for systemic "white privilege" than our current system.
I share none of the "sin" of evil rich white people, because I am not evil or rich. Just like I don't want to blame black retarded gay atheists for you...that wouldn't be fair to them.
White privilege doesn't exist, but you're dumber than a sack of bricks so there's no point going further.
saying something doesn't exist, isn't the same thing as that thing not existing. you do know that right?
AHAHAHAHAHA. This coming from...the hardcore evangelical atheist. Dude, you're too fucking funny. Thanks for the laugh.
Except that is not privilege that is bias, white people being the only ones with an outside bias.
Yes some people will show ingroup bias but on average white people will gladly help the black guy over the white guy.
More then that, every other group except whites has heavy ingroup bias, so by your own logic there is a black privilege that is far greater then white privilege.
Where is the white privilege?
Your definition is bad, your logic is bad and you don't see why what you said before is stupid.
Okay, this is epic.
Also, note the sudden shift? Suddenly, if the people on the top are "privileged," it's because they're smarter. Or something. He's right that trying to break people down for being "too smart" is ridiculous, but it's funny that doesn't apply to "white privilege," but suddenly does if you look too deep at who actually has "white privilege."
Also, they're finally admitting the whole "white privilege" thing is racist bullshit. At least that's good.
Lastly, not sure if you saw my post and it stuck, or we just happened to use the same common phrase, but it's funny that I said just hours ago "white privilege" is and always will be a crock of shit. And, to clarify since text can be weird, I'm not screaming "plagiarism" or anything, I just thought it was interesting.
The new mud golems can't tell the difference between whites and Fellow Whites™, so they're trying to perform damage control before the golems turn on them for the 110th time.
Oh, yay, you're back. And as retarded as ever.
Racial disparities exist. Monolithic racial "privilege" does not. Why do I care if "whites" are overrepresented as CEOs for example (they're not; they're underrepresented), if their policies hate my guts? I am not a CEO, so it doesn't matter to me. Content of character/action, not color of skin. If all CEOs were black, but all policies implemented favored whites, that would be a better argument for systemic "white privilege" than our current system.
I share none of the "sin" of evil rich white people, because I am not evil or rich. Just like I don't want to blame black retarded gay atheists for you...that wouldn't be fair to them.
White privilege doesn't exist, but you're dumber than a sack of bricks so there's no point going further.
AHAHAHAHAHA. This coming from...the hardcore evangelical atheist. Dude, you're too fucking funny. Thanks for the laugh.
Dude's one of the biggest religious zealots here, he just doesn't realize he got poached by a cult instead of leaving religion.
Saying something exists is not the same as that thing existing, you do know that right?
Why do you have to be so dumb
Except that is not privilege that is bias, white people being the only ones with an outside bias.
Yes some people will show ingroup bias but on average white people will gladly help the black guy over the white guy.
More then that, every other group except whites has heavy ingroup bias, so by your own logic there is a black privilege that is far greater then white privilege.
Where is the white privilege?
Your definition is bad, your logic is bad and you don't see why what you said before is stupid.
I believe you have the wrong web site. You want www.forums.suckingcock.com
Write this in English next time