Kamala is probably going to be rerun even if it’s behind a Newsome. Otherwise Whitmer would be the next dem grab for a soulless cunt. RFK just announced a female VP pick. This means in all reality the RNC is going to push a female VP because “we’re progressive too” is the current motif. Money is on Noem or Gabbard to be trumps pick due to this…
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
There was apparently buzz at Tulsi running as Trump's VP since she said in a recent Tucker interview when asked she'd be honoured to serve her country in that way or any way, so at least says the right thing.
I don't care if it's a woman or not so long as they aren't a backstabber, that's first. If you can get a woman that gets that part but also gets enough women to vote going 'Trump's mean but he has a female VP who hasn't got a cackle so I'll vote him' good, I just want him to WIN then be unrestricted like day one I want him to pardon ALL of Jan 6 prisoners, Assange, Snowden, hell see if you can immediately pardon everyone that uses 2nd ammendment self defence in Blue cities.
I don’t think you’ll find any woman who would run that wouldn’t backstab Trump at every turn.
It's almost like us woman haters are right.
The "women haters" are wrong in that saying everything bad is caused by women first and foremost. Even people who like women should be able to understand that women do not have a place in politics. They just don't have the mentality for it at all.
It's about using the right tool for the job. You don't use a can opener to build a house. A can opener has its place and position, and can't be used for everything. Because some people might try to build a house with a can opener and fail miserably doesn't mean all the blame falls on the can opener. It falls on the person who thought that was the right idea.
That's fair. I'm willing to blame whoever is at fault, and that's not always women. I've just found that women are uniquely willing and able to inflict evil in ways that violent dindus or sex pest trannies aren't. Anyone who isn't a retard knows what the latter two are about and protecting yourself from them is possible without resisting biological urges. Women on the other hand can and will use those biological urges to exploit and destroy men for their own benefit. The nature of the threat they pose (enabled by the laws and culture) is far more insidious, and it only exists because as a whole they lack any sense of honor or morality.
Sounds like some dumb shit a woman would say ngl
To be fair to the ladies, the number of male politicians who wouldn't backstab Trump can probably be counted on one hand.
Then no woman VP, simple as.
At this point, I don't care if it turns out that the only woman that won't backstab Trump is a former Miss World winner, that's the number one thing that comes first.
The sex that evolved to immediately spread their legs to conquerors the moment their own tribe's men show weakness? What could possibly go wrong?
There's a reason that successful societies kept women of power historically. It wasn't some nefarious conspiracy to keep the poor wahmen down, just a recognition that power isn't paired with accountability when women are involved.
I never know what to make of Tulsi, but God knows orange man could do much much worse than her.
She voted for every gun control bill that came across her desk when she was in office. I will be pissed if he picks her. Like pissed enough to not vote. Fuck Tulsi.
The only thing I'm okay with Tulsi touching is foreign policy. Anything else, keep her far far away.
She’s like a mix of Bernie and RFK voting record wise
Unfortunately the last part isn't possible, pardon from the feds is only for federal crimes, that's why the other person who pardons is the Governor for state level crimes.
He can definitely put immense pressure on the governor though, but a lot of these states have retard laws like 'shooting into an occupied dwelling' which is what that guy who blatted the tik-tokker a while back got charged with.
Shame, I'd just like castle doctrine to be a federally recognised policy.
As long as there are NIMBYs that think 'we can talk it out' to literal savages who will gladly kill you for looking at them funny, and those people have access to voting, that will sadly not be the case.
Thankfully, they are putting themselves in the position where they are the ones who need castle doctrine (and 2A in general) the most, and will not use it. The consequences are sad, but funny in an ironic way.