I know nothing about these people, and the article is lengthy, so I won't comment in depth, but as I was skimming one part jumped out at me.
The problem with a man always working on himself is that he may also be working on you.
While technically partly true, it has that feel of 'men can never win.' Not to mention the double standard. If a woman goes to therapy, should she be distrusted? The author would probably say even asking the question and bringing up the double standard is itself sexist.
But, yeah, apparently even men working to better themselves should be looked at with suspicion.
It’s pretty simple when you realize that the end of the day the majority of women truly do believe they are children and incapable of agency in any interaction with an adult.
They maintain the doublethink that they are both "strong and independent" and make perfect decisions, AND can never be held accountable because every bad outcome is due to circumstances outside of her control.
Women stop maturing at puberty and don't start again until her first grandchild.
It's a tragically schizophrenic article. I think this paragraph can sum it up succinctly:
The relationship struck Sarah’s friends as odd. At one point, Sarah said, “I just want to be with my kids and cook for my man.” “I was like, Who says that?” says a close friend. “I mean, I’ve known her for 30 years. She’s a powerful, decisive, strong woman. We grew up in this very feminist community. That’s not a thing either of us would ever say.”
I can't believe I read all that. What a pointless article.
75% is a surface level recap of this dude's work over the past years, and the rest is telling the reader that he's a bit flaky with keeping scheduled meeting times with friends and family. Cool story bro
The NYMag Huberman story is a sign of the feminization of our culture and thus the inevitable rise of "toxic feminine" traits, of which reputation-targeting attacks are one.
Some American women swear they're deeply oppressed, but the truth is women have unprecedented power today. Whether they use it constructively is another story.
But as was the case in a masculinized culture where the negative traits of immature men are more of a problem, a feminized culture will suffer the negative traits of immature women.
Reputational attacks, journalism is tabloid news, competency is judged by whether you're likable, exes and hearsay are reliable sources, any influence on the "innocent" public is suspicious, etc.
What kind of culture would have mainstream "news" where angry exes gossip about a successful man as a subtle means of undermining his career?
A culture where immature women dominate, and that's exactly the culture at publications like NYMag.
People call that "the longhouse" these days: society and the common good are centered around the needs and wants of women. It's why the discussion around getting married still exists despite it being a worse and worse deal for men.
I know nothing about these people, and the article is lengthy, so I won't comment in depth, but as I was skimming one part jumped out at me.
While technically partly true, it has that feel of 'men can never win.' Not to mention the double standard. If a woman goes to therapy, should she be distrusted? The author would probably say even asking the question and bringing up the double standard is itself sexist.
But, yeah, apparently even men working to better themselves should be looked at with suspicion.
It’s pretty simple when you realize that the end of the day the majority of women truly do believe they are children and incapable of agency in any interaction with an adult.
They maintain the doublethink that they are both "strong and independent" and make perfect decisions, AND can never be held accountable because every bad outcome is due to circumstances outside of her control.
Women stop maturing at puberty and don't start again until her first grandchild.
Frightening, isn't it?
It's a tragically schizophrenic article. I think this paragraph can sum it up succinctly:
Because the feminism leaves a woman's body the instant she thinks she has a shot at a fit, charismatic, bearded, famous, wealthy gigachad.
yes
As we see time and again, women will not let a famous unmarried man off lightly.
This makes me bullish on Huberman, though how he responds to this article will be the real test.
Hitpiece.
"Yeah he knows science and gives good advice... BUT HE IS MEAN TO WOMEN!"
But in reality he isn't mean, he is just autistic. This cunt is tearing him down because men aren't allowed to be seen as wise.
I can't believe I read all that. What a pointless article.
75% is a surface level recap of this dude's work over the past years, and the rest is telling the reader that he's a bit flaky with keeping scheduled meeting times with friends and family. Cool story bro
(no offense meant to OP for sharing)
I read more about this and the whole thing can be summarized as "Hoes Mad".
The NYMag Huberman story is a sign of the feminization of our culture and thus the inevitable rise of "toxic feminine" traits, of which reputation-targeting attacks are one.
Some American women swear they're deeply oppressed, but the truth is women have unprecedented power today. Whether they use it constructively is another story.
But as was the case in a masculinized culture where the negative traits of immature men are more of a problem, a feminized culture will suffer the negative traits of immature women.
Reputational attacks, journalism is tabloid news, competency is judged by whether you're likable, exes and hearsay are reliable sources, any influence on the "innocent" public is suspicious, etc.
What kind of culture would have mainstream "news" where angry exes gossip about a successful man as a subtle means of undermining his career?
A culture where immature women dominate, and that's exactly the culture at publications like NYMag.
https://x.com/salomesibonex/status/1772681117444763899
People call that "the longhouse" these days: society and the common good are centered around the needs and wants of women. It's why the discussion around getting married still exists despite it being a worse and worse deal for men.