Yup, Rowling is a TERF and she's just an evil as the troons that she bitches about. She made this bed and it's time for her to get fucked in it.
Is the professional sports thing an injustice? Yes, but it's odd to me that some of the same people who cry loudly about the injustice that is men in women's sports, are extremely quiet on the abomination that is grooming children into transgenderism.
It's not an injustice. Feminists destroyed men's sports and men's spaces with Title IX, so letting trannies destroy their sports and spaces is totally just. Matt Walsh and his ilk complain about this because they're tradcuck simps. Besides, the only way the troon problem will be dealt with is if it starts inconveniencing women.
Michael Knowles was arguing about the troons and he said something about troons only working if we remove special privileges and spaces for women and he's not prepared to do that. It's annoying that every argument is centralized around protecting women. I don't understand this attitude even in conservative circles. Men have abandoned the idea that they can have spaces, ideas, privileges only designated to themselves.
It's because of the chivalrous ideal of the perfect gentlemen defending women. As it so happens, that is a legitimate concept. The problem is not that men are exhorted to protect women, it's that women won't shut up and let the man protect them instead of acting like backseat drivers.
This is the great error of mainstream conservatism, they see men are abandoning their chivalrous role and decide the problem is men instead of focusing on the women that completely abdicated and even attempt to subvert their end of the bargain.
Conservatives pander to women because women are far more likely to vote for big government then men and conservatives want that just as much as progressives, and likely for similar ends, too.
the only way the troon problem will be dealt with is if it starts inconveniencing women
Will that even work this time? On one side you have the TERF+Con alliance saying protect women's spaces, and on the other side you have intersectional feminists pretending the feminine benis is stunning and brave. None of them are actually speaking out against troonery. The ones who call out the abomination the loudest are the detrans influencers, and some people here tell us we should shun them too.
It's a necessary but not sufficient condition. My main point is that no one is going to give a shit if women are shielded from any negative effects, including tradcuck types like Walsh.
Yup, Rowling is a TERF and she's just an evil as the troons that she bitches about. She made this bed and it's time for her to get fucked in it.
It's not an injustice. Feminists destroyed men's sports and men's spaces with Title IX, so letting trannies destroy their sports and spaces is totally just. Matt Walsh and his ilk complain about this because they're tradcuck simps. Besides, the only way the troon problem will be dealt with is if it starts inconveniencing women.
Michael Knowles was arguing about the troons and he said something about troons only working if we remove special privileges and spaces for women and he's not prepared to do that. It's annoying that every argument is centralized around protecting women. I don't understand this attitude even in conservative circles. Men have abandoned the idea that they can have spaces, ideas, privileges only designated to themselves.
It's because of the chivalrous ideal of the perfect gentlemen defending women. As it so happens, that is a legitimate concept. The problem is not that men are exhorted to protect women, it's that women won't shut up and let the man protect them instead of acting like backseat drivers.
This is the great error of mainstream conservatism, they see men are abandoning their chivalrous role and decide the problem is men instead of focusing on the women that completely abdicated and even attempt to subvert their end of the bargain.
Conservatives pander to women because women are far more likely to vote for big government then men and conservatives want that just as much as progressives, and likely for similar ends, too.
Just sell Men Spaces as a way to protect women from "inherent toxic masculinity".
Will that even work this time? On one side you have the TERF+Con alliance saying protect women's spaces, and on the other side you have intersectional feminists pretending the feminine benis is stunning and brave. None of them are actually speaking out against troonery. The ones who call out the abomination the loudest are the detrans influencers, and some people here tell us we should shun them too.
It's a necessary but not sufficient condition. My main point is that no one is going to give a shit if women are shielded from any negative effects, including tradcuck types like Walsh.