Hell, I was at a gun store shortly after the Rittenhouse verdict. One of the guys behind the counter complained about Biden and then moments later complained about Rittenhouse "shooting up all those black people."
Most people have no clue. They absorb bits and pieces from the media they're exposed to, which might be 1/2 hour of MSM news per week. They won't ever get involved until something that they care about gets fucked up so badly that they're forced to notice it.
"Mountain Dewritos" the Zero-To-Hero /v/ The Musical parody song was PUBLISHED ten years ago. A full-on decade ago. It was well-known enough a decade ago, and mainstream enough knowledge within these circles, that goofy songs could hit 175000 views on Youtube about it.
Interesting perspective. I think a lot of what you've said is true. I was around for GG, and I remember all the similar arguments. They only ever have one. If they don't like you, you're not their audience, you don't matter, but every single thing you do they don't like. Nothing has changed.
Another problem is, they don't even know what their problem is. Their arguments hold no water the second you think about what they said.
They'll say 'lol you're not the audience anyway' ... then why the fuck are you mad at people who will never buy your game anyway, that you don't even want to buy your game. That's what the curator is for. None of that should matter to them. And yet they mald over it every time. "Ugh, what are those people I can't stop thinking about doing now? I don't care about them, and gosh they have bad opinions, but here's me, constantly upset about them pointing out that I'm wrong. Better antagonize the people I totally don't think about at all!" The self own just makes it pathetic.
I saw someone, Ian Hamilton (I think) on twitter mention that the 200k+ people on the sweet baby curator has is not a big number when you consider the number of people who want diversity in games.
So let's check his math
SBI Detected is over 254k now, but lets drop that to 200k because my math is complete ass.
He said that 200k people is .007% of gamers. Somehow he had these numbers from a survey. Lets take a closer look.
Using those numbers, 2 million would therefore be .07%, 20 million would be .7%, and 200 million would be 7%.
So 100% of "gamers" would be 3.2 billion people. Am I doing this right? Feels like way too fucking many people.
Is this guy really trying to claim that almost half the world's total population are computer gamers, use steam, and took a survey that said they want diversity in gaming? I find that a little hard to believe.
Beside the fact that 254k is more than the total number of people living in the city I live in. It's a big fucking number.
It depends on payment as some are 'paid with access' so feel like unique little snowflakes because they get to play a gr before everyone else. For YouTubers and streamers this can mean a boost in viewership as they're the first ones with content on it.
Problem is, that's extremely short lived viewership, put it this way, a YouTuber like Russian Badger can release a video about a game MONTHS after it's release and STILL dwarf these early access guys. It's more about the creator in this regard than the access for viewers.
Anyway I think last year broke them, with the amount of trash released, feels like the general audience went 'fuck it' and they no longer care about big studios while a smaller indie one gets more leeway.
I'm confused about all of this. What the fuck is Sweet Baby and I never understood the gamer gate thing. I've tried reading about it online but there doesn't seem to be a clear genesis point. Everyone just gives some little tidbit.
Still a lot of normies out there.
Hell, I was at a gun store shortly after the Rittenhouse verdict. One of the guys behind the counter complained about Biden and then moments later complained about Rittenhouse "shooting up all those black people."
Most people have no clue. They absorb bits and pieces from the media they're exposed to, which might be 1/2 hour of MSM news per week. They won't ever get involved until something that they care about gets fucked up so badly that they're forced to notice it.
There's always kids growing up too. The kids who were 8 when GamerGate happened are now 18.
And they've been indoctrinated all to hell by this shit.
We've known this for ten years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mrm9fQLNO0
"Mountain Dewritos" the Zero-To-Hero /v/ The Musical parody song was PUBLISHED ten years ago. A full-on decade ago. It was well-known enough a decade ago, and mainstream enough knowledge within these circles, that goofy songs could hit 175000 views on Youtube about it.
Interesting perspective. I think a lot of what you've said is true. I was around for GG, and I remember all the similar arguments. They only ever have one. If they don't like you, you're not their audience, you don't matter, but every single thing you do they don't like. Nothing has changed.
Another problem is, they don't even know what their problem is. Their arguments hold no water the second you think about what they said.
They'll say 'lol you're not the audience anyway' ... then why the fuck are you mad at people who will never buy your game anyway, that you don't even want to buy your game. That's what the curator is for. None of that should matter to them. And yet they mald over it every time. "Ugh, what are those people I can't stop thinking about doing now? I don't care about them, and gosh they have bad opinions, but here's me, constantly upset about them pointing out that I'm wrong. Better antagonize the people I totally don't think about at all!" The self own just makes it pathetic.
I saw someone, Ian Hamilton (I think) on twitter mention that the 200k+ people on the sweet baby curator has is not a big number when you consider the number of people who want diversity in games.
So let's check his math
SBI Detected is over 254k now, but lets drop that to 200k because my math is complete ass.
He said that 200k people is .007% of gamers. Somehow he had these numbers from a survey. Lets take a closer look.
Using those numbers, 2 million would therefore be .07%, 20 million would be .7%, and 200 million would be 7%.
So 100% of "gamers" would be 3.2 billion people. Am I doing this right? Feels like way too fucking many people.
Is this guy really trying to claim that almost half the world's total population are computer gamers, use steam, and took a survey that said they want diversity in gaming? I find that a little hard to believe.
Beside the fact that 254k is more than the total number of people living in the city I live in. It's a big fucking number.
he's lying. he's a lying faggot who wants to ruin something created by those infinitely his greater.
IIRC, Ian Hamilton is an "accessibility" grifter. I wouldn't believe anything that guy says.
Makes sense, since nothing he said made any sense in that tweet.
It depends on payment as some are 'paid with access' so feel like unique little snowflakes because they get to play a gr before everyone else. For YouTubers and streamers this can mean a boost in viewership as they're the first ones with content on it.
Problem is, that's extremely short lived viewership, put it this way, a YouTuber like Russian Badger can release a video about a game MONTHS after it's release and STILL dwarf these early access guys. It's more about the creator in this regard than the access for viewers.
Anyway I think last year broke them, with the amount of trash released, feels like the general audience went 'fuck it' and they no longer care about big studios while a smaller indie one gets more leeway.
You should see what gets sent in review copies for games. There's special editions and there's water pistols filled with vodka.
I'm confused about all of this. What the fuck is Sweet Baby and I never understood the gamer gate thing. I've tried reading about it online but there doesn't seem to be a clear genesis point. Everyone just gives some little tidbit.
Many thanks!