Is that the reason there was suddenly a gigantic push to start attacking and shaming anyone who liked anime girls? Instead of telling real girls to improve their personalities, they attacked and shamed guys for liking anime girls.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
Moms are completely replaceable by every study on single parenting. Boys bodies quit literally start dying earlier without a father. There is no physical deterioration from not having a mom. The single largest indicator for crime and poverty are single moms, single dads are equivalent to lower middle income 2 parent households.
I’ll be sure to tell my nursing son that while his mom is rocking him to sleep 👌🏻
You went from mom’s are useless - dads are important - single moms are bad
Dads are important. So are moms. It’s almost like they’re meant to raise children together.
To act like moms don’t matter just shows what a fucked up world view you truly have
No it just shows that you will always follow your preconceived biases over what every bit of data shows.
Moms can matter. The overwhelming majority don’t, sorry that hurts your feelings.
Enjoy feeding goyslop formula and having the state raise your child while you work due to your irrational hatred of women 👌🏻
They're studies. They are bullshit lol
If low crime and poverty was the only necessary ingredient of a successful society, then the Jewish elite would be perfectly OK.
Yes, such bullshit that boys telomeres have been shown to shorten by up to 15% when they don’t have a father.
Come back to me when you can make that legible
Intentionally or otherwise, you just did a massive goalpost shift. You guys were arguing about whether moms were replaceable, and your counterpoint was that dads weren't. No one argued that they were; I think everyone here agrees that fathers are very important.
Also, boys needs fathers, yes. But if we're doing hypothetical scenarios like your artificial womb scenario, you could technically argue for an "artificial father" scenario too. The telomere gap is, I'd imagine, due to physical activity. Boys with more male influence are likely to exercise more, or have more testosterone which will likely result in more exercise as well. So if that's the argument for needing a father (which again, I agree is very important, and I'm just arguing the technical aspects here, not making an actual proposal), more male teachers, or more focus on PE, or state-mandated camping or eventually military service...all kinds of things would have the same or greater effect on telomeres specifically as a father, I'd wager. Again, not arguing for those things, just pointing out that you can make all kinds of hypotheticals.
Thinking about it, though, I bet more male teachers would actually solve some serious issues, like the lowered average testosterone levels we're seeing. A whole lot of things need to be re-normalized, including both fatherhood and male teachers.
That’s not why genetic aging occurs. The telomeres degradation has nothing to do with exercise and everything to do with an actual biological need for a father. Your hypothetical is grossly incorrect, and well just hilariously stupid if you took 5 seconds to think about it.
But when they don't have a mother there's no negative effect at all? That's obviously bullshit. It occurred to me, though, that you don't even have studies that conclude that.
Staying out of trouble and having a career is the bare minimum to be a functioning part of society. It doesn't preclude other negative effects, some of them very significant.
"The Jews are successful and have low crime" is the most basic talking point to deflect criticism of their group.
Yes they do, the reason it’s notable is it’s THE ONLY COMBINATION that has that effect. Daughters aren’t impacted by a loss of either parent in their telomeres, sons aren’t impacted by the loss of a mother. Studies have control groups…
And when the bare minimum is a statistical achievement compared to your peers?