I think a lot of huwhite libs have a misconception about how they're perceived, in that they think other races want to join them near the top of the cultural pantheon and do stuff like live in quiet leafy neighborhoods, exchange tasty ethnic cuisine, and enjoy gay Broadway musicals. Call it the suburban Kumbaya.
On the other hand a lot of people on the hardcore right think that minorities are on a mission to destroy white people specifically. Actually this is a misconception (except about rich Jews).
Outside of deracinated whites, the overriding psychology is ethnic narcissism. Minorities agitate to climb to the top, but if you've ever known them at "the top" then you realize they actually don't care much about whites, or other races, either for good or bad. It's all about self-love, associating with people who mirror your own traits. They enjoy twerking to rappers you can't understand and if you don't get it, you're invisible. Or they'll serve up a 10-course curry meal for a house party in pure blissful ignorance of whether a single white person (or Mexican, or Korean) attended. This is the climate at the Eric Adams administration. The important thing to him isn't pushing out Irish and Italians, it's being able to hang out with the brothas and sistas all day while they run the city into the ground. Notice the distinct absence of Chinese at a time when Queens is basically an Asian borough.
I'm a hapa, so I've seen more than a few settings. An image that's become familiar to me is a white guy or girl on the periphery of a bunch of ethnic friends. They could be a nervous smiling lib who's flattered to be the white guinea pig plied with Kenyan donuts and spicy radishes or a savvy operator interested in having "experiences" and deliberately unconcerned with his own ethnic identity. Either way, they spend time meditating on being the white friend in a non-white group, while the group only cares about the group and couldn't care less if a ringer is attached.
I was at a wedding recently where the bride and groom were both halfies. Technically this should have made it some kind of 21st century post-ethnic celebration of enlightenment, but in practice, the bride made a heartfelt declaration of "I AM INDIAN" to a sea of saris and kurtas before the white grandfather was driven out of the reception by Bollywood music at 100 decibels. The other family was OK, much more culturally American, but it was clear which side won out. I just felt sad.
Equality > Equity
Idc of it shows my age. Idc if it shows my politics. Equity is, and always was bullshit. It was designed to divide, and it did.
by my observation, equity makes the same fundamental mistake that communism does. it assumes that it is possible to perfectly calculate the needs of every individual such that there is no waste, and perfectly distribute resources to exactly fill those needs. Equity also assumes that the calculation of needs will have zero bias or corruption whatsoever.
all these things are and will always be patently false so long as human nature is a thing.
My opinion of equity is that it was malicious, and designed to be so.
Equality in death. Life is hierarchy.
That's not the American way. Of that how you feel, find an exit.
Lol okay. That's why we were founded with slaves and indentured servants. Equality is a communist myth.
Indentured servitude was about akon tone. You need actual history lesson, not revisionist history.
This is because of a lot of minorities, especially women of color pushing for anti-white ideology. There also seems to be some truth to it, I remember some interviews in France and the immigrants were saying something like is their turn and is payback. Minorities, or at least their representatives like the mayor of London cheering for whites becoming a minority does not help.
And then there are black people in US, they are extremely anti-white. There are a lot of nice black people in red states and rural areas but it seems the more blue a state is the more racist black people become.
Also... South Africa.
If other races could get away with it in Western nations, they would.
I was going to touch on that, but the post was getting long. My overall point is that day-to-day, person-to-person, you're much more likely to encounter narcissism and myopic indifference than hatred.
I definitely agree racial animus is a motivation, especially with some migrants into Europe, but in practice it serves as more of a convenient pretext for many minorities to take white people's stuff. A racial casus belli greases the wheels.
This can be seen in BLM riots where many, if not most of the looters don't know or care what actually happened to kick it off. In South Africa the Bantu blacks obviously need an excuse to take the white people's land and money. Meanwhile, the reversal of Zimbabwe's anti-white policies shows that Africans are, at their core, pragmatic.
I believe that trend can be explained mostly by the influence of Jews stoking and organizing black activism in metro areas. It's amazing how many narratives and movements are aided or even fabricated by Jewish intelligentsia.
Minorities are here to plunder resources created by Whites and do everything they can to promote their own people out of self-interest. Every minority is embracing the obnoxious leftist drivel because it is a tool for their own personal gain, impacts on society be damned.
Most minorities seem to have no interest in stability, tranquility, or cleanliness because they don’t perceive the value of qualities that don’t directly benefit them in an immediate fashion. They don’t think about indirect consequences whatsoever and merely see the world as entirely the result of direct consequences. They don’t act to specifically destroy White People or White Society, Minorities destroy White People and White Society indirectly by pushing interests that benefit themselves in the very short term while being completely incapable of seeing how their interests indirectly make themselves worse off, particularly in the long run.
For everyone, other than the globalist engineers, the culture war is about nothing other than the establishing of a status quo that benefits yourself and the people in your group. That's why you'll never see the Al Sharptons of the world raise charities for the victims of a tsunami in Indonesia or an earthquake in Turkey. It's only about changing the world until it fits your personal needs, until you have more than me, at which point it becomes about resisting further change - the progressive turns into the reactionary. The only people who are actively trying to change the world to their own detriment are White people and, as you say, there is a recent push to guilt the Japanese into ruining their own country, as well.
So, I've been thinking about gay men lately... Specifically the "based fags" on our side, like Glenn Greenwald, Andy Ngo or the traitor Stephen Fry. They all got what they wanted, never mind who gave it to them and why. Suppose we win this bitch, and we decide to start pushing our civilization back up the slippery slope... well, this would probably mean that they'd all have to give up their precious gay marriage (and gay divorce) and go back into the closet. Don't ask, don't tell. I've been wondering about how they'd react to this, and at which point they'd try to stab us in the back, in order to prevent it.
What do you think about this? Have you been thinking about gay men lately? Hmmm?
I feel that Asians (from China/Japan/SK etc) and Indians should be natural allies of white people.
Because they have all been subject to terrorist attacks from “religion of peace”.
Its difficult for white liberals to attack an Indian or Chinese person who says “muslims are responsible for most child rape gangs” or “our border is being invaded”
A lot of Indians are muslim, not the majority but a lot.
Also, Chinese can be really cool, but if they came from a well off family from mainland China, they likely have a LOT of the CCP propoganda baked into their brain, so it takes time and work for them to see the light, and some never do. Moreover, even if they break the brainwashing, they usually are careful because they know they are being monitored.
Good post. You write well.