I honestly believe people like her are specifically set up by the WEF as the 'crazy' candidate in order to make more moderate sounding candidates sound palatable so they can get things through with the slow creep and the normies will vote for them and not even notice what's going on. Given what we know about controlled ops now it's entirely plausible.
By controlling the candidates & manipulating the positions they espouse, the overton window can be pushed while introducing new, more terrible ideas (which will be policy in twenty years.) They can begin acclimating us frogs in the pot to the new, higher temperatures in the pot while having us vote on what vegetables to add.
I honestly believe people like her are specifically set up by the WEF as the 'crazy' candidate in order to make more moderate sounding candidates sound palatable so they can get things through with the slow creep and the normies will vote for them and not even notice what's going on. Given what we know about controlled ops now it's entirely plausible.
Maybe also to softly introduce "crazy" ideas so people get used to them.
I think both of you are correct.
Definitely a "why not both" situation.
By controlling the candidates & manipulating the positions they espouse, the overton window can be pushed while introducing new, more terrible ideas (which will be policy in twenty years.) They can begin acclimating us frogs in the pot to the new, higher temperatures in the pot while having us vote on what vegetables to add.
Loudly and stupidly introduce crazy ideas
And then have the press claim that she's "winning" with her idiotic ideas, and let the normie NPCs absorb it.