And this is 100% correct of an assessment. Anyone ever in an argument with a woman before would recognize the implications. When a woman is proven wrong in an argument she spins the whole argument to be about how the way in which the man showed her she was wrong is wrong.
That's debate in a nutshell. You can be 100% right but if you said it in a manner the women didn't like, it doesn't matter how right you are.
They're usually not "debating" in the sense of critically thinking together with the shared goal of arriving at the truth or a workable hypothesis, they're just "sharing." It's only about emotions and social signals, not the actual conceptual content or the pragmatic questions of what and how to do things.
And this is 100% correct of an assessment. Anyone ever in an argument with a woman before would recognize the implications. When a woman is proven wrong in an argument she spins the whole argument to be about how the way in which the man showed her she was wrong is wrong.
That's debate in a nutshell. You can be 100% right but if you said it in a manner the women didn't like, it doesn't matter how right you are.
They're usually not "debating" in the sense of critically thinking together with the shared goal of arriving at the truth or a workable hypothesis, they're just "sharing." It's only about emotions and social signals, not the actual conceptual content or the pragmatic questions of what and how to do things.