I'm glad I'm not the only one who put two and two together on that, also let's be real it wasn't a 'murder' it was an assassination. They did not want him winning, which is why I think there's a very real possibility they may try to assassinate Trump and have some 'deranged leftist' go after him possibly before November 2024. Either that or they'll let him win and then try to do it that way by deliberately surrounding him with people who will look the other way when ordered.
have some 'deranged leftist' go after him possibly before November 2024.
Why have a 'deranged leftist' do it when you could have a 'deranged far-right nutjob' do it? "Disillusioned with Trump, ultraMAGA supporter Righty McWhiterton, using an AR15 assault rifle with a high capacity magazine clip and a bump stock..." I can unfortunately see it already.
Although I think assassination is the last card they'll play; they'd rather stop him by any other means. Even these retards realize that might be a bridge too far. Might. God, I wish normies weren't so fucking normie. It's insane that the US government could conceivably all but openly kill a populist presidential candidate frontrunner, and it's not a guarantee that things would get crazy.
also let's be real it wasn't a 'murder' it was an assassination
I used to call these assassinations but since putting politicians in the bottom tier of occupations during Trump's administration, I don't really use the special term for them anymore. It is murder, just of a government official (current or former) to shift power and influence
They did not want him winning
If I recall, Abe had already stepped down from being Prime Minister (due to "health problems") for what was about a year. But he held a lot of influence over the public, like Trump, because he actually was trying to fix the problems Japan was having while keeping the focus on the nation. It's like putting an old man in a retirement home, sure he has some issues but is mostly fine, and then putting him to death because he talks too much to people outside and motivates them to be better.
They won’t kill Trump. If that was on the table, it would have already happened. This indicates that his untimely death would be a legitimate red line; their simulations point to literal civil war if he is killed.
Or even short of civil war, it would very well lead to assassinations of their own political figures. If they truly believe Trump is a "cult leader" then taking him out would mean his more extreme followers will have nothing to lose.
More like an insurgency. No one is going to line up in uniforms like last time.
Look up Tom Wales. He was a prosecutor that was president of Ceasefire Washington. He was murdered 22 years ago, case is still unsolved. That is what will happen, on a national basis.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who put two and two together on that, also let's be real it wasn't a 'murder' it was an assassination. They did not want him winning, which is why I think there's a very real possibility they may try to assassinate Trump and have some 'deranged leftist' go after him possibly before November 2024. Either that or they'll let him win and then try to do it that way by deliberately surrounding him with people who will look the other way when ordered.
Why have a 'deranged leftist' do it when you could have a 'deranged far-right nutjob' do it? "Disillusioned with Trump, ultraMAGA supporter Righty McWhiterton, using an AR15 assault rifle with a high capacity magazine clip and a bump stock..." I can unfortunately see it already.
Although I think assassination is the last card they'll play; they'd rather stop him by any other means. Even these retards realize that might be a bridge too far. Might. God, I wish normies weren't so fucking normie. It's insane that the US government could conceivably all but openly kill a populist presidential candidate frontrunner, and it's not a guarantee that things would get crazy.
I agree mostly...
I used to call these assassinations but since putting politicians in the bottom tier of occupations during Trump's administration, I don't really use the special term for them anymore. It is murder, just of a government official (current or former) to shift power and influence
If I recall, Abe had already stepped down from being Prime Minister (due to "health problems") for what was about a year. But he held a lot of influence over the public, like Trump, because he actually was trying to fix the problems Japan was having while keeping the focus on the nation. It's like putting an old man in a retirement home, sure he has some issues but is mostly fine, and then putting him to death because he talks too much to people outside and motivates them to be better.
They won’t kill Trump. If that was on the table, it would have already happened. This indicates that his untimely death would be a legitimate red line; their simulations point to literal civil war if he is killed.
You damned right it would.
Or even short of civil war, it would very well lead to assassinations of their own political figures. If they truly believe Trump is a "cult leader" then taking him out would mean his more extreme followers will have nothing to lose.
More like an insurgency. No one is going to line up in uniforms like last time.
Look up Tom Wales. He was a prosecutor that was president of Ceasefire Washington. He was murdered 22 years ago, case is still unsolved. That is what will happen, on a national basis.
Assassinating Trump would make him the ultimate martyr for the right. If that doesn't lead to civil war, I don't know what could.