It's redundant. On the political spectrum Anarchism is the farthest right, to the right of Libertarianism, Communism the farthest left. I've always understood the method of ranking to be from most state control on the left to least state control on the right.
Sounds like a new way to disparage Libertarianism, since "far-right" is being used in the press to connote something like "Nazi."
Nazism is, of course, on the left of the political spectrum, as much as the left likes to deny it..
That's certainly one paradigm, but there are multiple schools of thought on political spectrums. It says something about the integrity of journalists that they always make these statements without ever defining terms, allowing some readers confirm their own biases and leaving the rest of us to guess.
Perfect example of why far/extreme is deleterious (what a pretentious word, but it works here) manipulation of language. Deliberately conflates being principled; not swayed by societal noise, stupid games, and the status quo; with zealotry and deceptiveness.
Aside from this instance of establishment allergic reaction to integrity, leftism has infected South American society for far too long. Too much of the government and populace have a dependency mindset. The political structure has to be disrupted, then a self-sufficient mass of citizens have to form a responsible breakaway state to surpass 19th/early 20th century prosperity. Even if Javier pegs Argentina to the US dollar, that's not much of a win for Argentinians, neither does it inspire the international community of productive folk.
Leftists put Argentina's economy in the shitter but it's more important the evil meanie "far-right" candidate doesn't win, but that's fine because if they end up like Venezuela it wasn't real leftism
The media already started this with the plandemic, but since the Potato has been in office it's become more apparent
I seriously believe they're going to try and convince the partially controlled masses that freedom, the exercise of free will and non-interventionalism is evil if it doesn't conform to the global agenda
What did they mean by this?🤔
He likes freedom. Freedom is far right.
I still love that NYT article where, and I quote, "Shouting “Freedom” and other anti-government slogans, hundreds of Cubans took to the streets"
Seriously, appreciating liberty or not trusting the government is, according to the tyrants, far right. Thus, "far right libertarian."
It's a cue to tell the normies what opinions they need to pretend to have.
I was just going to say. What the fuck are they even thinking?
It's redundant. On the political spectrum Anarchism is the farthest right, to the right of Libertarianism, Communism the farthest left. I've always understood the method of ranking to be from most state control on the left to least state control on the right.
Sounds like a new way to disparage Libertarianism, since "far-right" is being used in the press to connote something like "Nazi."
Nazism is, of course, on the left of the political spectrum, as much as the left likes to deny it..
That's certainly one paradigm, but there are multiple schools of thought on political spectrums. It says something about the integrity of journalists that they always make these statements without ever defining terms, allowing some readers confirm their own biases and leaving the rest of us to guess.
The political spectrum as a concept is a tool of thought control. We should just reject it wholesale.
I agree.
Perfect example of why far/extreme is deleterious (what a pretentious word, but it works here) manipulation of language. Deliberately conflates being principled; not swayed by societal noise, stupid games, and the status quo; with zealotry and deceptiveness.
Aside from this instance of establishment allergic reaction to integrity, leftism has infected South American society for far too long. Too much of the government and populace have a dependency mindset. The political structure has to be disrupted, then a self-sufficient mass of citizens have to form a responsible breakaway state to surpass 19th/early 20th century prosperity. Even if Javier pegs Argentina to the US dollar, that's not much of a win for Argentinians, neither does it inspire the international community of productive folk.
Leftists put Argentina's economy in the shitter but it's more important the evil meanie "far-right" candidate doesn't win, but that's fine because if they end up like Venezuela it wasn't real leftism
Why would Thomson lie?
The media already started this with the plandemic, but since the Potato has been in office it's become more apparent
I seriously believe they're going to try and convince the partially controlled masses that freedom, the exercise of free will and non-interventionalism is evil if it doesn't conform to the global agenda
Good, sounds like there's hope.
Unfortunately he didn’t do so well yesterday …
They have a run off next month and likely he will lose