Is this meant to counterclaim that some immigrants hold weapons? If so, I still don't think we should gun them indiscriminately. I especially don't think we should call gunning them indiscriminately 'humane.'
No, Michael Brown was 'unarmed', but he was highly aggressive and dangerous. And I don't believe in 'gunning down' immigrants, indiscriminately or otherwise. I'm an immigrant myself. But I don't think invaders are the same as immigrants.
Obviously I was talking about illegal immigrants. Your original point was that it was humane to shoot them up so that they wouldn't die in 'decrepit vessels'. I took issue with that. It is not humane to do so.
This place has been getting more and more embittered with time. There's practically no humor left. You always struck me as a sensible one, but now you're talking about shooting people being humane. I think the degradation of this place is affecting you too.
Very well. But I'm used to the media taking statements about illegals and framing them as being about 'immigrants' in general. But even here, it's not even about illegal immigrants in general. The point was not that they should be gunned down in the streets. The point is that they should not be allowed to reach our shores.
Your original point was that it was humane to shoot them up so that they wouldn't die in 'decrepit vessels'. I took issue with that. It is not humane to do so.
It would prevent a lot more death, yeah.
This place has been getting more and more embittered with time. There's practically no humor left. You always struck me as a sensible one, but now you're talking about shooting people being humane. I think the degradation of this place is affecting you too.
I agree with you that a lot of crazy people have come here, but I've never known it to be any other way. The subreddit was different, but this place has always been full of lunatics.
As for whether it affects me. Possibly, but not to drive me in their direction. Lunatics generally are not the best advertisement for their position. However, I've always believed in defending our shores from invaders.
Is this meant to counterclaim that some immigrants hold weapons? If so, I still don't think we should gun them indiscriminately. I especially don't think we should call gunning them indiscriminately 'humane.'
Yes, I'm Catholic.
No, Michael Brown was 'unarmed', but he was highly aggressive and dangerous. And I don't believe in 'gunning down' immigrants, indiscriminately or otherwise. I'm an immigrant myself. But I don't think invaders are the same as immigrants.
Obviously I was talking about illegal immigrants. Your original point was that it was humane to shoot them up so that they wouldn't die in 'decrepit vessels'. I took issue with that. It is not humane to do so.
This place has been getting more and more embittered with time. There's practically no humor left. You always struck me as a sensible one, but now you're talking about shooting people being humane. I think the degradation of this place is affecting you too.
Very well. But I'm used to the media taking statements about illegals and framing them as being about 'immigrants' in general. But even here, it's not even about illegal immigrants in general. The point was not that they should be gunned down in the streets. The point is that they should not be allowed to reach our shores.
It would prevent a lot more death, yeah.
I agree with you that a lot of crazy people have come here, but I've never known it to be any other way. The subreddit was different, but this place has always been full of lunatics.
As for whether it affects me. Possibly, but not to drive me in their direction. Lunatics generally are not the best advertisement for their position. However, I've always believed in defending our shores from invaders.