The varying lifestyle argument is essentially circumcised white men have lower std rates than non circumcised African/Hispanic men. It still doesn’t track considering circumcised white men have lower risks across the board compared to uncircumcised white men.
If we’re using this line of thought then circumcision still wins as it is a marker of a healthier lifestyle in every study. You can only argue lifestyle to a certain point, as people who are circumcised and uncircumcised in the same ethnicity and socioeconomic status and having different outcomes.
You can be a rich White Christian man who only bones his wife or a rich White degenerate man who bones hookers among many other possibilities. It still has problems.
The varying lifestyle argument is essentially circumcised white men have lower std rates than non circumcised African/Hispanic men. It still doesn’t track considering circumcised white men have lower risks across the board compared to uncircumcised white men.
White men don't have a singular, unifying lifestyle either. The same logic still applies, though I assume it involves less cannibalism.
If we’re using this line of thought then circumcision still wins as it is a marker of a healthier lifestyle in every study. You can only argue lifestyle to a certain point, as people who are circumcised and uncircumcised in the same ethnicity and socioeconomic status and having different outcomes.
You can be a rich White Christian man who only bones his wife or a rich White degenerate man who bones hookers among many other possibilities. It still has problems.
And regardless, being circumcised in both cases has lower risks…