Minn. ‘Marijuana Czar’ Dethroned on Day One, Public Outraged by Regulator Hypocrisy
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
You are referring to cartridges. That is different from THC products that can be used in vape batteries, which is what she was selling.
It is a legal distinction in every legalized state. You cannot sell a product containing THC that can be used via a vaping battery.
They separated the two industries and it is a major penalty if you get caught mixing them.
I guess the distinction is escaping me. It seems that one way or another you can vape THC in every legal state. I don't know anything about this lady.
It is a semantic issue. You are including "vaping" to include 510 threaded cartridges as well as juul style cartridges.
You can't do that, those are two entirely different industries that you are using the same term for.
They are legally separated so you shouldn't just call them all 'vaping' because it is inaccurate and leads to this exact problem.
Vaping is for tobacco. It has NOTHING to do with cannabis.
Respectfully, I don't think we should alter our terminology to match the law. Vaping is vaping, and you can consume any number of drugs that way.
People aren't going to have clarity about the 12 ft clouds of vapor people are blowing out, no matter how hard you try at the store level.
It isn't about the law, it is about accuracy.
The term is not a catch-all that describes everything. That is like arguing that beer shouldn't be called beer, it should be called 'alcohol' with no differentiation from hard liquor.
It's a legal term that specifically means something. Misusing it doesn't help anyone.