Minn. ‘Marijuana Czar’ Dethroned on Day One, Public Outraged by Regulator Hypocrisy
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
It is a semantic issue. You are including "vaping" to include 510 threaded cartridges as well as juul style cartridges.
You can't do that, those are two entirely different industries that you are using the same term for.
They are legally separated so you shouldn't just call them all 'vaping' because it is inaccurate and leads to this exact problem.
Vaping is for tobacco. It has NOTHING to do with cannabis.
Respectfully, I don't think we should alter our terminology to match the law. Vaping is vaping, and you can consume any number of drugs that way.
People aren't going to have clarity about the 12 ft clouds of vapor people are blowing out, no matter how hard you try at the store level.
It isn't about the law, it is about accuracy.
The term is not a catch-all that describes everything. That is like arguing that beer shouldn't be called beer, it should be called 'alcohol' with no differentiation from hard liquor.
It's a legal term that specifically means something. Misusing it doesn't help anyone.