California lawmakers may reverse a 2016 bill that prohibits state-funded travel to 26 states with laws California says discriminate against LGBT people.
Democratic state Sen. Toni Atkins is spearheading the initiative. She wants to reverse the boycott over “unintended economic consequences,” and she said the ban has “unintentionally isolated the LGBTQ community.”
Ahahahahahaha. Turns out banning your state citizens from travelling to 26 states isn't so good for business. Who would have thought?
Atkins proposed repealing the law and replacing it with a bill to promote LGBT outreach in these states. The San Diego senator, who is gay, said most of the $583,000 designated for the campaign would be privately funded.
So they are just going to spend their own money to put up gay shit in red states? Why does this need to be a bill?
In April, a city ordinance in San Francisco similar to A.B. 1887 boycotting purportedly anti-LGBT states was repealed after seven years. The city’s plan to economically strain conservative states was ineffective, and a report found that the policy was increasing the city's expenses and administrative responsibilities. Officials agreed the policy did not produce the outcome they intended.
Amazing. Even the cities were doing it.
A.B. 1887 has also proven to be problematic for many Black scholars in California, as the law is preventing them from collaborating with peer professionals who study in the South, where much of their research is grounded. To Black historians and scholars involved in academic dialogue surrounding Black American history, the majority of the South has been declared off-limits. Black educators and historians have no access to university funding for their research.
Hahahahaha. Of course it hurt blacks the most, because Democrats designed it.
And now, for the ULTIMATE example of leftist arrogance and ignorance:
Sen. Atkins has come to the conclusion that the status quo isn’t working. “I thought, it’s now or never. How long do you sustain something like that?”
They can't do that. All these "state travel bans" are always limited to state-funded travel.
Which may be working because I'd imagine there are people so hopelessly dependant on government aid that they literally can not function on a daily basis without some handout.
With the money of others and the consequences being handled by them as well! As soon as it is your money or your problem, then it is time to shut it down!
Ready for a laugh?
Ahahahahahaha. Turns out banning your state citizens from travelling to 26 states isn't so good for business. Who would have thought?
So they are just going to spend their own money to put up gay shit in red states? Why does this need to be a bill?
Amazing. Even the cities were doing it.
Hahahahaha. Of course it hurt blacks the most, because Democrats designed it.
And now, for the ULTIMATE example of leftist arrogance and ignorance:
That's still bullshit. What gives CA the right to decide what state is okay for state-funded travel and which isn't?
Which may be working because I'd imagine there are people so hopelessly dependant on government aid that they literally can not function on a daily basis without some handout.
With the money of others and the consequences being handled by them as well! As soon as it is your money or your problem, then it is time to shut it down!
We're just playing musical chairs with illegals and faggots. This place is a shithole.
they don't WANT you or your outreach.
So California might be creating its own GayCIA to interfere in foreign states?
26 states should impose a California travel ban, denying any of those californian mongrel currs from entering their state.
Why does California continue to operate as if it were a separate nation? Why is it allowed to behave as though it were such?
"imperialism is good actually" the Left