Is it better to have the fig leaf of "a voice" over naked tyranny, or to have no formal political power but have your interests represented?
Conservative women should understand that in the absence of universal suffrage, they would live in a world where their political goals are a foregone conclusion rather than a borderline impossibility.
A truly exceptional "conservative" woman would understand this and would advocate against women as a result.
Is it better to have the fig leaf of "a voice" over naked tyranny, or to have no formal political power but have your interests represented?
Conservative women should understand that in the absence of universal suffrage, they would live in a world where their political goals are a foregone conclusion rather than a borderline impossibility.