"Because he hated the jews" is absolutely a critical aspect of why he did what he did (which was murder millions of them and plunge Europe into war). The jews were a bourgeois race, and so their extermination was a categorical imperative. He hated the jews as any Leftist would hate the bourgeois. We can talk about why he hated the jews additionally, but most of the time Leftists and NatSocs need to stop there because otherwise they'd have to admit his Socialism.
"Because he hated the jews" is absolutely a critical aspect of why he did what he did (which was murder millions of them
Any forum with absolute free speech, that doesn't censor this discussion, has had robust debate about this topic, and many people have presented extremely compelling evidence that this isn't what happened, and that it was physically impossible for the Germans to do. This is one of the central ways for how most of were convinced, how we began to reject the lies surrounding WW2, and realizing how thoroughly propagandized our society is.
and many people have presented extremely compelling evidence that this isn't what happened, and that it was physically impossible for the Germans to do.
Total fucking nonsense.
First of all, the Germans managed to kill twenty million Russians, and that was predominantly through regular warfare. Russians exterminated over a hundred thousand Poles in about a year through traditional execution methods. The Khmer Rouge managed to exterminate 20% of their own population in 5 years. The NatSoc atrocities in Greece and Crete demonstrate the capacity for wanton murder and intentional starvation, and that's still not really part of the Holocaust. Those are just other mass killings.
The idea that the Germans simply weren't capable of killing millions of a specific demographic in their own territories (while actively murdering other demographics anyways) is asinine and darkly comical.
Mass executions of jews were more than entirely doable, the unique part of the holocaust was that it was the capital investment of murder as if it were a commodity. A factory of death is not a misnomer, it's not easy to just kill many hundreds of people and dispose of the bodies in a timely manner. The NatSocs mentioned in their own documents that the work of mass executions just through bullets was rather difficult and demoralizing work, especially as time went on. Making it possible for fewer people to kill more in an efficient way was a the goal. One of the benefits of the Sonderkommando system in the extermination camps was that they would be the ones handling most of the bodies, and so would endure the brunt of the psychological damage... then they too would be executed after a few weeks, keeping the demoralization of the NatSoc troops to a minimum. These notes where actually what led to the Milgram experiment on deference to authority.
Again, it is only at this point that we go back to "compelling evidence". The evidence we have is from the bodies, the mass graves, the witnesses, the logistical records, and importantly: the confessions! If they write what they are doing in their own handwriting and admit to it, that's a pretty good indicator they did it. The best evidence from Holocaust Deniers is "hurr durr wooden doors" and "hurr durr it's an Olympic sized swimming pool". Fuck off, we both know this is a lie. Even "Holocaust Skeptics" have to come to the eventual conclusion that "all the records of passengers stop in specific places, and then they never seem to be deported anywhere else". Even David Irving, as much of a liar as he is, admits that Dachau was absolutely an extermination camp. Turns out that a camp that's barely a couple acres can't just store a hundred thousand people in it without overcrowding.
Holocaust Denial is the only "conspiracy theory" that I've ever seen built entirely out of motivated reasoning. All others have an autistic focus on detail that they don't understand or confuse themselves with. Holocaust Denial is about being proud of ignorance publicly, while demanding the atrocities privately. "It didn't happen but it should have"
I can disprove the Holocaust narrative with just a calculator. Take the number of crematoria the Nazis had, the amount of time and fuel it takes to cremate one body (even using the lower numbers for the more advanced and efficient modern crematoria), and calculate how many people the Nazis could cremate within the given time frame they had. It's physically, temporarily, and thermodynamically impossible for the Nazis to have done what is claimed. I can break this down, very specifically, if you want. Just ask.
The official Holocaust narrative is that most of the deaths in the concentration camps were due to gassing, and that the Nazis cremated the bodies. It's also claimed that the Nazis, in full retreat, to hide their "war crimes", dug up the people they previously killed, and put them in crematoria, to "burn" the bodies, to "hide the evidence". It's also claimed the Nazis did most of these killings, while in a multi front war, with strained supply lines, using railways heavily damaged due to Allied attacks, while short on fuel and manpower (remember the Battle of the Bulge?), and in retreat during the latter stages of the war.
The mass graves found don't account for the claimed number of dead.
There are mass graves, counting in the hundreds of thousands, but that was due to the heavy conflict from the war. Even "Holocaust deniers" like myself still claim that roughly 250,000 people died in the camps, but that's mostly attributed to starvation (from broken supply lines) and typhus outbreaks due to lice, which is what Zyklon B is actually used for (fumigating clothing to kill lice).
Furthermore, actual experts in execution methods have examined the Nazi "death camps", and said they couldn't do what is claimed. Look at actual execution gas chambers. They don't use wooden doors. They also don't use Zyklon B, which has problems reaching deadly inhalation levels within the air, especially when it's cold, like it is during European winters.
On top of this, the camps had hospitals, swimming pools, maternity wards, and other non-essential buildings and activities. If the Nazis were exterminating jews and other undesirables, why would they give them all of these things, and not just kill them outright? It makes zero sense. It makes much more sense that they were labor camps, especially since the Nazis were short on manpower in the latter stages of the war.
There are also tons and tons of lies many jews have told about the Holocaust, either for clout, to push the narrative, and/or to get reparations. Thus far, Germany has paid 80 billion Euros worth of Holocaust reparations. Quite a lucrative business, but this is assuming a motive purely on greed. When fully analyzed, greed doesn't explain everything. Such lies include "masturbation machines" used to kill young jewish boys (fake), rollercoasters of death that fling helpless passengers into a pit of fire (fake), making jews into lampshades and soap (fake), giant electric chairs that could electrocute dozens of people at once (fake), open fire pits to "cremate" the dead (this is physically impossible to do), bodies used to fuel fires to burn more bodies (this doesn't happen, it takes fuel to burn a body, and a controlled enclosed environment to create the necessary pressures and temperatures to properly cremate), Anne Frank's journal (fake), etc. Furthermore, the "admissions" of Nazis after the war was due to extreme torture, and many of the admissions were written in languages the German POWs couldn't speak. In one instance, of all the German POWs examined, all but 2 had their genitals mutilated beyond repair. The Nuremburg trials also threw out common legal chain of custody rules, so the Allied accusers could say anything they wanted, present any evidence they wanted, even if it was fake. The documents you're citing are pretty much all fake.
It gets even more ridiculous because the official Holocaust historians claim that intact bones weren't found because the Nazis had numerous bone crushing machines. Most people don't know this, but cremating a body leaves the bones intact. However, not a single bone crushing machine has ever been found.
This is all just icing on a very sick cake, however, because nothing refutes the mathematics of the Nazis being incapable of cremating the number of dead that is claimed. I don't care what else is said. Nothing else refutes this fact.
It's not like this is a bridge too far, either. We all know by now that the people in power lie about everything. Why wouldn't they lie about WW2 or other history? They have every motivation to do so. It's why there are so many WW2 propaganda pieces put out every year (movies, TV shows, video games), portraying Nazis as evil, to reinforce the propaganda we were taught in school about WW2. Propaganda is only effective if its constantly reaffirmed, otherwise people break the conditioning. Fortunately, due to the internet and actual free speech sites, more people are breaking the conditioning anyway.
I can disprove the Holocaust narrative with just a calculator. Take the number of crematoria the Nazis had, the amount of time and fuel it takes to cremate one body (even using the lower numbers for the more advanced and efficient modern crematoria), and calculate how many people the Nazis could cremate within the given time frame they had. It's physically and thermodynamically impossible for the Nazis to have done what is claimed. I can break this down, very specifically, if you want. Just ask.
Oh my god, another one. That makes two of you unmitigated fucking retards that doesn't understand that there's more than one death camp, and more than one method of execution, and more than one way of disposing of corpses. How the fuck any of you can say "you learned about the Holocaust all the time", while never managing to learn anything about the Holocaust besides one number, one camp, and one method is beyond me.
What's even stupider is that you managed to make the exact same mistake that Soviets made when calculating the deaths at Autchwitz that put their number 4 times higher than reality.
You can't deboonk the holocaust because you literally don't know anything about it.
This includes your insane comments about rollercoasters. What you don't realize (because you've never looked into the holocaust) is that the only people who have ever said anything about that shit are Holocaust Deniers. No legitimate source has ever mentioned any of that shit. Actually atrocities like removing gold fillings, stealing all jewelry, forced prostitution, pressure chamber experiments, chemical experiments, random murders, and the mass executions are all verifiable.
It gets even more ridiculous because the official Holocaust historians claim that intact bones weren't found because the Nazis had numerous bone crushing machines. Most people don't know this, but cremating a body leaves the bones intact. However, not a single bone crushing machine has ever been found.
You know that bones don't typically cremate (at certain temperatures), but you don't know the literal thousands of bodies and skeletons that were dumped into mass graves, that the allies had to disinter and move with bulldozers? Apparently you actually believe that there's no bodies from the holocaust. Like I said, you literally do not know anything about the holocaust. You don't know enough about the holocaust to challenge it.
The documents you're citing are pretty much all fake.
I'm citing witnesses. I'm citing the accused. Hell most of the shit at Nuremburg wasn't so much related to the Holocaust as it was related to the start of the war. Again, this weird obsession with denying something that none of the NatSocs themselves ever denied. None of the people actually charged with crimes against humanity regarding the holocaust said, "you guys made this whole thing up, these camps don't even exist, there aren't bodies". They said: "I didn't commit those crimes, but I saw others doing it", or "I wasn't there", or "I did it because I was required to", or "I was just following orders." You would think some of the defendants would have rejected the claims. You don't know enough about Nuremburg to criticize it.
This is all just icing on a very sick cake, however, because nothing refutes the mathematics of the Nazis being incapable of cremating the number of dead that is claimed. I don't care what else is said. Nothing else refutes this fact.
Again, your ignorance of the event is a refutation of your calculation. You are more back-asswards on this than the people that said Kyle Rittenhouse shot 4 black people in a mass shooting in Kenosha. You literally do not understand enough of the basics of the event to accurately criticize it.
24 downvotes suggest that a few people here probably think the Nazi "final solution to the Jewish question" was a good idea. All you need to do to gauge Hitler's jew-hatred is listen to a couple of his speeches lambasting and scapegoating them. Oh, there's the bit about concentration camps and gas chambers, too.
Every reasonable and literate person understands that Hitler was a human being and not some sort of super-villain. Efforts to make him supernatural have to do with the embarrassment of having to acknowledge his humanity and the fact that anyone is capable of committing atrocities, especially if you are several layers removed bureaucratically from the evil. You make a decree and leave Himmler and the SS to work out the details.
You also need to understand that in Mein Kampf Hitler was creating a PR portfolio for political purposes.
Hell, even Wolfenstein understood that he was human in their comical and crazed portrayals of him.
The dumbest shit here is that they know I'm fucking right. If they read Mien Kampf, then they know that I'm laying it out accurately. Some of them did, so in response, we can understand that their downvotes are performative garbage. I'd be upvoted if I said it was a good thing. There is no debating the facts, they just don't like having it shoved back in their face. Kinda like the way Goering didn't when he was shown footage of the death camps.
I think the doubt is more in the number.
6M Jews. Hmm.
As of today, there are what, 118K Jews in Germany, 6.3M Jews in ISRAEL, and 16M total Jews in the world?
Even in the US where they number the most 5.7M for a non Jewish state they are 1.7% of the population. Probably less.
And that's basically the same everywhere. Roughly 1% of any given country's population. A little more or less here or there. The population size of Germany pre WW2 is suspiciously hard to get reliable info on but roughly 60M. 1% of that would be 600,000. And we could extrapolate to France Poland etc. To be honest, I don't think there were 6M Jews to be found in Europe at the time.
There's no real arguments about the 6 million number, counting non-jewish holocaust deaths is more contentious because some people just don't want to include any non-jewish deaths in what counts as the holocaust, rather than just additional killings.
The problem is you have a ton of false presumptions here of what you think the number of jews in a country should be, and that's just not the case, especially when you start broadening the definition of who a jew is under the Nuremburg Laws.
At the time, I don't remember the exact figure, but there would have been well over ten million jews in Europe at the time. And in this case (because the Nazis are counting them this way), we have to consider anyone of any parental heritage to a jew, even if non-practicing. Many jews would have self-identified as such, though in Germany, there were many jews that didn't (which is why the Nazis built entire departments to find jews that weren't self-identifying and were non-practicing, all through lineage) were calling themselves "Germans of the mosaic faith" and identifying as German... because they actually did see themselves as German, not jewish. Capitalization was intentional there because they were subscribing to an idea of Germanism.
IIRC, there were over a million jews in Germany as well. Poland, on the other hand, while not being majority jewish, had probably the single highest number of jews per capita in Europe. This is one of the primary reasons that there were so many concentration and extermination camps built in the country. IIRC, there were at least 4 million jews in Poland alone. Again, don't have the exact numbers off the top of my head, but were somewhere vaugely around 30% of the population.
And this is a critical point, Hitler wasn't trying to push jews just out of Germany. The logic of judeo-bolshevism is that no jew can exist anywhere. If you remove jews from Germany, and let them settle in Poland, then they will cross the border. You have to get rid of all of them, everywhere, all at once (which is what Kristallnacht was about, but just for everywhere in Germany). He's trying to "save Europe", by removing or killing every jew in Europe. This is also why he didn't just focus on mass relocation, like other genocides do. If you just remove and displace people, there's a chance they could return, or gather into an army, or become the majority demographic somewhere. Historical evidence does show that even if jews are forcibly relocated, they will often return. So, relocation doesn't solve the judeo-bolshevism problem that states that all jews, everywhere, will always seek to destroy nations, and will travel to nations in order to parasitize and destroy them. You can't allow any single jew alive. You have to kill all of them.
Hence, why the NatSocs where forcing Italy to export Italian Jewish Fascists to be sent to extermination or concentration camps. They didn't just kill jews in Germany, or in Poland, but in every single country that they could get the puppet governments to agree to. This is also why Poland experienced such a massive population loss from the war. It's actually one of the only countries losses from war are rivaled by losses explicitly from the Holocaust.
"Because he hated the jews" is absolutely a critical aspect of why he did what he did (which was murder millions of them and plunge Europe into war). The jews were a bourgeois race, and so their extermination was a categorical imperative. He hated the jews as any Leftist would hate the bourgeois. We can talk about why he hated the jews additionally, but most of the time Leftists and NatSocs need to stop there because otherwise they'd have to admit his Socialism.
Any forum with absolute free speech, that doesn't censor this discussion, has had robust debate about this topic, and many people have presented extremely compelling evidence that this isn't what happened, and that it was physically impossible for the Germans to do. This is one of the central ways for how most of were convinced, how we began to reject the lies surrounding WW2, and realizing how thoroughly propagandized our society is.
Total fucking nonsense.
First of all, the Germans managed to kill twenty million Russians, and that was predominantly through regular warfare. Russians exterminated over a hundred thousand Poles in about a year through traditional execution methods. The Khmer Rouge managed to exterminate 20% of their own population in 5 years. The NatSoc atrocities in Greece and Crete demonstrate the capacity for wanton murder and intentional starvation, and that's still not really part of the Holocaust. Those are just other mass killings.
The idea that the Germans simply weren't capable of killing millions of a specific demographic in their own territories (while actively murdering other demographics anyways) is asinine and darkly comical.
Mass executions of jews were more than entirely doable, the unique part of the holocaust was that it was the capital investment of murder as if it were a commodity. A factory of death is not a misnomer, it's not easy to just kill many hundreds of people and dispose of the bodies in a timely manner. The NatSocs mentioned in their own documents that the work of mass executions just through bullets was rather difficult and demoralizing work, especially as time went on. Making it possible for fewer people to kill more in an efficient way was a the goal. One of the benefits of the Sonderkommando system in the extermination camps was that they would be the ones handling most of the bodies, and so would endure the brunt of the psychological damage... then they too would be executed after a few weeks, keeping the demoralization of the NatSoc troops to a minimum. These notes where actually what led to the Milgram experiment on deference to authority.
Again, it is only at this point that we go back to "compelling evidence". The evidence we have is from the bodies, the mass graves, the witnesses, the logistical records, and importantly: the confessions! If they write what they are doing in their own handwriting and admit to it, that's a pretty good indicator they did it. The best evidence from Holocaust Deniers is "hurr durr wooden doors" and "hurr durr it's an Olympic sized swimming pool". Fuck off, we both know this is a lie. Even "Holocaust Skeptics" have to come to the eventual conclusion that "all the records of passengers stop in specific places, and then they never seem to be deported anywhere else". Even David Irving, as much of a liar as he is, admits that Dachau was absolutely an extermination camp. Turns out that a camp that's barely a couple acres can't just store a hundred thousand people in it without overcrowding.
Holocaust Denial is the only "conspiracy theory" that I've ever seen built entirely out of motivated reasoning. All others have an autistic focus on detail that they don't understand or confuse themselves with. Holocaust Denial is about being proud of ignorance publicly, while demanding the atrocities privately. "It didn't happen but it should have"
Not even gonna bother reading this drivel anymore.
Yeah, he's one of the best writers on this board, but he's completely unhinged about this topic.
I can disprove the Holocaust narrative with just a calculator. Take the number of crematoria the Nazis had, the amount of time and fuel it takes to cremate one body (even using the lower numbers for the more advanced and efficient modern crematoria), and calculate how many people the Nazis could cremate within the given time frame they had. It's physically, temporarily, and thermodynamically impossible for the Nazis to have done what is claimed. I can break this down, very specifically, if you want. Just ask.
The official Holocaust narrative is that most of the deaths in the concentration camps were due to gassing, and that the Nazis cremated the bodies. It's also claimed that the Nazis, in full retreat, to hide their "war crimes", dug up the people they previously killed, and put them in crematoria, to "burn" the bodies, to "hide the evidence". It's also claimed the Nazis did most of these killings, while in a multi front war, with strained supply lines, using railways heavily damaged due to Allied attacks, while short on fuel and manpower (remember the Battle of the Bulge?), and in retreat during the latter stages of the war.
The mass graves found don't account for the claimed number of dead. There are mass graves, counting in the hundreds of thousands, but that was due to the heavy conflict from the war. Even "Holocaust deniers" like myself still claim that roughly 250,000 people died in the camps, but that's mostly attributed to starvation (from broken supply lines) and typhus outbreaks due to lice, which is what Zyklon B is actually used for (fumigating clothing to kill lice).
Furthermore, actual experts in execution methods have examined the Nazi "death camps", and said they couldn't do what is claimed. Look at actual execution gas chambers. They don't use wooden doors. They also don't use Zyklon B, which has problems reaching deadly inhalation levels within the air, especially when it's cold, like it is during European winters.
On top of this, the camps had hospitals, swimming pools, maternity wards, and other non-essential buildings and activities. If the Nazis were exterminating jews and other undesirables, why would they give them all of these things, and not just kill them outright? It makes zero sense. It makes much more sense that they were labor camps, especially since the Nazis were short on manpower in the latter stages of the war.
There are also tons and tons of lies many jews have told about the Holocaust, either for clout, to push the narrative, and/or to get reparations. Thus far, Germany has paid 80 billion Euros worth of Holocaust reparations. Quite a lucrative business, but this is assuming a motive purely on greed. When fully analyzed, greed doesn't explain everything. Such lies include "masturbation machines" used to kill young jewish boys (fake), rollercoasters of death that fling helpless passengers into a pit of fire (fake), making jews into lampshades and soap (fake), giant electric chairs that could electrocute dozens of people at once (fake), open fire pits to "cremate" the dead (this is physically impossible to do), bodies used to fuel fires to burn more bodies (this doesn't happen, it takes fuel to burn a body, and a controlled enclosed environment to create the necessary pressures and temperatures to properly cremate), Anne Frank's journal (fake), etc. Furthermore, the "admissions" of Nazis after the war was due to extreme torture, and many of the admissions were written in languages the German POWs couldn't speak. In one instance, of all the German POWs examined, all but 2 had their genitals mutilated beyond repair. The Nuremburg trials also threw out common legal chain of custody rules, so the Allied accusers could say anything they wanted, present any evidence they wanted, even if it was fake. The documents you're citing are pretty much all fake.
It gets even more ridiculous because the official Holocaust historians claim that intact bones weren't found because the Nazis had numerous bone crushing machines. Most people don't know this, but cremating a body leaves the bones intact. However, not a single bone crushing machine has ever been found.
This is all just icing on a very sick cake, however, because nothing refutes the mathematics of the Nazis being incapable of cremating the number of dead that is claimed. I don't care what else is said. Nothing else refutes this fact.
It's not like this is a bridge too far, either. We all know by now that the people in power lie about everything. Why wouldn't they lie about WW2 or other history? They have every motivation to do so. It's why there are so many WW2 propaganda pieces put out every year (movies, TV shows, video games), portraying Nazis as evil, to reinforce the propaganda we were taught in school about WW2. Propaganda is only effective if its constantly reaffirmed, otherwise people break the conditioning. Fortunately, due to the internet and actual free speech sites, more people are breaking the conditioning anyway.
Oh my god, another one. That makes two of you unmitigated fucking retards that doesn't understand that there's more than one death camp, and more than one method of execution, and more than one way of disposing of corpses. How the fuck any of you can say "you learned about the Holocaust all the time", while never managing to learn anything about the Holocaust besides one number, one camp, and one method is beyond me.
What's even stupider is that you managed to make the exact same mistake that Soviets made when calculating the deaths at Autchwitz that put their number 4 times higher than reality.
You can't deboonk the holocaust because you literally don't know anything about it.
This includes your insane comments about rollercoasters. What you don't realize (because you've never looked into the holocaust) is that the only people who have ever said anything about that shit are Holocaust Deniers. No legitimate source has ever mentioned any of that shit. Actually atrocities like removing gold fillings, stealing all jewelry, forced prostitution, pressure chamber experiments, chemical experiments, random murders, and the mass executions are all verifiable.
You know that bones don't typically cremate (at certain temperatures), but you don't know the literal thousands of bodies and skeletons that were dumped into mass graves, that the allies had to disinter and move with bulldozers? Apparently you actually believe that there's no bodies from the holocaust. Like I said, you literally do not know anything about the holocaust. You don't know enough about the holocaust to challenge it.
I'm citing witnesses. I'm citing the accused. Hell most of the shit at Nuremburg wasn't so much related to the Holocaust as it was related to the start of the war. Again, this weird obsession with denying something that none of the NatSocs themselves ever denied. None of the people actually charged with crimes against humanity regarding the holocaust said, "you guys made this whole thing up, these camps don't even exist, there aren't bodies". They said: "I didn't commit those crimes, but I saw others doing it", or "I wasn't there", or "I did it because I was required to", or "I was just following orders." You would think some of the defendants would have rejected the claims. You don't know enough about Nuremburg to criticize it.
Again, your ignorance of the event is a refutation of your calculation. You are more back-asswards on this than the people that said Kyle Rittenhouse shot 4 black people in a mass shooting in Kenosha. You literally do not understand enough of the basics of the event to accurately criticize it.
Best I can do is 250,000 Jews.
It's okay for you to be an idiot. Well, maybe not in Germany, but for me, it's okay for you to be an idiot.
24 downvotes suggest that a few people here probably think the Nazi "final solution to the Jewish question" was a good idea. All you need to do to gauge Hitler's jew-hatred is listen to a couple of his speeches lambasting and scapegoating them. Oh, there's the bit about concentration camps and gas chambers, too.
Every reasonable and literate person understands that Hitler was a human being and not some sort of super-villain. Efforts to make him supernatural have to do with the embarrassment of having to acknowledge his humanity and the fact that anyone is capable of committing atrocities, especially if you are several layers removed bureaucratically from the evil. You make a decree and leave Himmler and the SS to work out the details.
You also need to understand that in Mein Kampf Hitler was creating a PR portfolio for political purposes.
Hell, even Wolfenstein understood that he was human in their comical and crazed portrayals of him.
The dumbest shit here is that they know I'm fucking right. If they read Mien Kampf, then they know that I'm laying it out accurately. Some of them did, so in response, we can understand that their downvotes are performative garbage. I'd be upvoted if I said it was a good thing. There is no debating the facts, they just don't like having it shoved back in their face. Kinda like the way Goering didn't when he was shown footage of the death camps.
I think the doubt is more in the number. 6M Jews. Hmm.
As of today, there are what, 118K Jews in Germany, 6.3M Jews in ISRAEL, and 16M total Jews in the world?
Even in the US where they number the most 5.7M for a non Jewish state they are 1.7% of the population. Probably less.
And that's basically the same everywhere. Roughly 1% of any given country's population. A little more or less here or there. The population size of Germany pre WW2 is suspiciously hard to get reliable info on but roughly 60M. 1% of that would be 600,000. And we could extrapolate to France Poland etc. To be honest, I don't think there were 6M Jews to be found in Europe at the time.
There's no real arguments about the 6 million number, counting non-jewish holocaust deaths is more contentious because some people just don't want to include any non-jewish deaths in what counts as the holocaust, rather than just additional killings.
The problem is you have a ton of false presumptions here of what you think the number of jews in a country should be, and that's just not the case, especially when you start broadening the definition of who a jew is under the Nuremburg Laws.
At the time, I don't remember the exact figure, but there would have been well over ten million jews in Europe at the time. And in this case (because the Nazis are counting them this way), we have to consider anyone of any parental heritage to a jew, even if non-practicing. Many jews would have self-identified as such, though in Germany, there were many jews that didn't (which is why the Nazis built entire departments to find jews that weren't self-identifying and were non-practicing, all through lineage) were calling themselves "Germans of the mosaic faith" and identifying as German... because they actually did see themselves as German, not jewish. Capitalization was intentional there because they were subscribing to an idea of Germanism.
IIRC, there were over a million jews in Germany as well. Poland, on the other hand, while not being majority jewish, had probably the single highest number of jews per capita in Europe. This is one of the primary reasons that there were so many concentration and extermination camps built in the country. IIRC, there were at least 4 million jews in Poland alone. Again, don't have the exact numbers off the top of my head, but were somewhere vaugely around 30% of the population.
And this is a critical point, Hitler wasn't trying to push jews just out of Germany. The logic of judeo-bolshevism is that no jew can exist anywhere. If you remove jews from Germany, and let them settle in Poland, then they will cross the border. You have to get rid of all of them, everywhere, all at once (which is what Kristallnacht was about, but just for everywhere in Germany). He's trying to "save Europe", by removing or killing every jew in Europe. This is also why he didn't just focus on mass relocation, like other genocides do. If you just remove and displace people, there's a chance they could return, or gather into an army, or become the majority demographic somewhere. Historical evidence does show that even if jews are forcibly relocated, they will often return. So, relocation doesn't solve the judeo-bolshevism problem that states that all jews, everywhere, will always seek to destroy nations, and will travel to nations in order to parasitize and destroy them. You can't allow any single jew alive. You have to kill all of them.
Hence, why the NatSocs where forcing Italy to export Italian Jewish Fascists to be sent to extermination or concentration camps. They didn't just kill jews in Germany, or in Poland, but in every single country that they could get the puppet governments to agree to. This is also why Poland experienced such a massive population loss from the war. It's actually one of the only countries losses from war are rivaled by losses explicitly from the Holocaust.