Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

15
posted 2 years ago by Lethn 2 years ago by Lethn +15 / -0
20 comments share
20 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
▲ 18 ▼
– Adamrises 18 points 2 years ago +18 / -0

One thing I've been quite confused by is how it seems that there definitely seems to be a strange bias I would argue towards fancy new classes and units when they get introduced in patches.

That's just power creep. Its a problem in basically any form of game with a long history.

And in some ways, its almost a requirement. People get set in their ways and what was once cool becomes boring. "Heroic Strike adds 919 damage per swing" was great 4 expansions ago, but you can't just add "Anti-Heroic Strike" which does 191 damage per miss. You need to add a move that pulls and roots and damages the enemy to really add any zest to the class.

And more importantly, you get people to try something. To use Starcraft as an example, if the newest patch did make something OP then the meta wouldn't change and nobody would actually bother using it. And then counterplays wouldn't develop and the scene would remain so unchanged it was basically worthless to have done anything at all.

Shit, its even in card games. In Yugioh a 1900 attack 4 star monster was basically the GOAT and a game winner, no effects needed. If they didn't introduce OP shit with 3 effects and 2800 attack you could summon from the deck that made 1900 cute to try, no one would ever remove Gemini Elf from their deck. It would become a card you were required to own to even remain competitive and then none of their new packs would be as in demand.

Its a balancing act to constantly do it without completely invalidating what came before it. Gentle push and pull. Most companies are not capable of that and instead just triple down on the creep until the vanilla content is so badly outclassed they need to "rework" it entirely to even keep up.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SarcasticRidley 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

In Yugioh a 1900 attack 4 star monster was basically the GOAT and a game winner

I was like 5 years old when I started playing that, then I stopped for 20 years, and came back to it in master duel.

Holy fuck it is impossible to win now unless you are playing meta. Literally everything revolves around special summons and shutting down the opponents field with ash blossom, etc.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Adamrises 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

There is a reason why the biggest Yugioh game of this decade was Duel Links. Because it started with the original sets and let you play with your old favorites again in a newish mode.

That's also the reason why the game dropped players hard after the GX era, because they started reaching the "more current" metas that everyone hates.

Personally, I just play Legacy of the Duelist if I don't use my physical decks and stick with the eras I enjoy. It gives plenty of fun even with only like 40% of the game I engage with and me and the boys can have that nostalgic fun.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy