The majority of the North American continent is basically a burn ecology; native plants are literally built to handle having fires sweep through every so often.
Only people who've never touched grass think otherwise.
If anything, we should be encouraging more fires to clean up the previous century worth of mismanagement fuckups.
This is why Commiefornia wildfires are as bad as they are. It's common knowledge at this point that controlled burns are an essential part of good forest management, but the left's climate change scam kept them from doing that over worries about carbon. So when they happened naturally they had an abnormally large amount of fuel, which is why they got so bad.
This is what annoyed me about the Australian fires the other year. No it’s nothing new, Australia is always on fire. In 74/75 (our fire seasons go across years cause souther hemisphere summer) a full 15-20% of the continent went up. But just cause this time it was over near Sydney and Melbourne and it was those soy’s first big fire season, suddenly the sky was falling and it’s cause climate change. Couldn’t possibly be the fact Australia is fire prone with flora and fauna that deliberately spread and enhance fires, a few wet tears followed by a dry one and forest mismanagement by shitty states. Gotta be globalwarming/climate change/climate catastrophe
Canada burns like every other year.
We have a obscene amount of forest, the fires are usually just further north west si you guys don't end up getting blasted by it.
This year is honestly pretty tame.
The majority of the North American continent is basically a burn ecology; native plants are literally built to handle having fires sweep through every so often.
Only people who've never touched grass think otherwise.
If anything, we should be encouraging more fires to clean up the previous century worth of mismanagement fuckups.
This is why Commiefornia wildfires are as bad as they are. It's common knowledge at this point that controlled burns are an essential part of good forest management, but the left's climate change scam kept them from doing that over worries about carbon. So when they happened naturally they had an abnormally large amount of fuel, which is why they got so bad.
This is what annoyed me about the Australian fires the other year. No it’s nothing new, Australia is always on fire. In 74/75 (our fire seasons go across years cause souther hemisphere summer) a full 15-20% of the continent went up. But just cause this time it was over near Sydney and Melbourne and it was those soy’s first big fire season, suddenly the sky was falling and it’s cause climate change. Couldn’t possibly be the fact Australia is fire prone with flora and fauna that deliberately spread and enhance fires, a few wet tears followed by a dry one and forest mismanagement by shitty states. Gotta be globalwarming/climate change/climate catastrophe