prominent figures in the RW sphere are at each other's throats about their favorite candidate.
but why? isn't it exceedingly obvious now that voter fraud is way past the point of no return? what the fuck does it matter which of these is "more likely" to win when an arbitrary number of Democrat votes will materialize at 3AM? just gotta vote harder?
focusing on the candidates is 100% a distraction.
All this Rep infighting is why Dems are going to win.
Dems are united. Vote blue no matter who. They back their fraud/rigging/fortification machine from top to bottom. They control elections. They determine who wins.
Reps can't even unite to fight the fraud because they don't like their own candidates and because they are too afraid of the Dem media.
It's called a Primary my dude. You can worry if there's still infighting after the convention.
There's been infighting since Trump won in 2016.
The Rep establishment refused to fight the Dem fraud in the midterms and the general election because they didn't like Trump. They looked the other way with everything the Dems did and now they've lost the country.
And quite frankly I do not see them stopping after the primary because both Trump and the Rep establishment have been burning bridges left and right.
It's not "infighting" when one side is Democrats in disguise. More like Invasion of the Body Snatchers
Do you understand what the uniparty is? The establishment and the base are entirely divorced at this point.
It's the Globetrotters and the Washington Generals at this point. A less entertaining WWE. We need outsider candidates from top to bottom. Problem is, if they trickle into D.C. they are corrupted or extorted faster than anything can change.
Can't really disagree with that or your other comments. Most of politics is pro-wrestling. I think what you're calling "infighting" is different than what the OP means by infighting. (or how I interpreted it)
If Ted Cruz can go from: Lyin' Ted Cruz to Lion Ted Cruz, then there is no issue here.
infighting is indeed horrible for the right, but again - this is arguing from within the framing of your enemy: that it is in fact possible for republicans to win, but that the left's voter base possesses some important qualities which allowed them to win in 2020 and would help them again in 2024.
the left made it forbidden to mention voter fraud in polite society, so it's more comfortable to construct arguments that can explain 2020 (and soon, 2024) without making fraud the central issue.
That's my point. The Rep establishment didn't fight this tooth and nail because they didn't like Trump.
The Dems did fight tooth and nail to keep their rigging machine going.
And so the Reps no longer stand a chance.
I mean, all it takes is backing the wrong candidate once and suddenly guns are gone and hate speech is being written into the constitution as bad.
That's the issue with the idea of "conserving" things. You actually have something to lose. The Dems can be blue no matter who because they can just renew the siege again later with a new helm.
Voting just doesn't matter. When it comes down to it, if true change were to even become close to a reality the system wouldn't allow it. They would just shut it all down or some other bs until they can fix it and run media damage control.
Voting is not the way this all ends.