I take you at your word - or is that a mistake? You never do seem to make many good faith arguments so maybe it is.
Oh?
Someone else claimed jews love shit
Someone you were defending, yes.
-I disproved this by showing the talmud (the “book of observant jews” if you will) clearly gloating about their presumed location for the eternal residence of Christ (i.e. boiling feces)
Now we're getting somewhere. I do believe that Maimonides fellow said this. Here's a question: he wouldn't be using that as a punishment for an allegedly false messiah if he thought shit was unpleasant, eh? So it's rather strange to use that as an argument for why "Jews love shit".
-this bold assertion of yours was then debunked by showing the true glee they take in degenerate filth and scatological humor directed at the savior of humanity.
Some may, and those that do may be condemned for that. But you'd rather condemn Jews as a whole, and I don't agree with that.
You think Maimonides wrote this? Are you fucking retarded dude? It says the author in the text itself, Onkelos
BTW, Nice job trimming out “scatological humor” from both my and the other guys argument you disingenuous hack. As I stated previously:
Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles one's hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a solid mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to give in to your argument, on account of the observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. Antonio would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened.
Here’s someone proud of their jewish tradition of scat worship:
You think Maimonides wrote this? Are you fucking retarded dude? It says the author in the text itself, Onkelos
Learn to read, retard. I'm not familiar with any Talmud. I am familiar with some things that Maimonides wrote, specifically because I think Hitchens quoted it in his book.
BTW, Nice job trimming out “scatological humor” from both my and the other guys argument you disingenuous hack. As I stated previously:
"Jews LOVE scat"
Funny, can you point me to where you see "ological humor" here?
Here’s someone proud of their jewish tradition of scat worship:
I don't like toilet humor. Unfortunately, nearly everyone in the West does, Jewish or not.
You mean “observant jews”? Because the talmud isn’t a “take it or leave it” kinda thing.
Ask 10 random observant Jews what they think happened to Jesus. I don't think many of them would say that. As you say, the Talmud is not a take it or leave it, at least as I understand it. More of an interpretation of their holy books.
It was implied in the other guys comment and explicit in mine.
Here’s what you said about Maimonides btw:
/> I do believe that Maimonides fellow said this[did you mean to use a colon here?]. Here's a question: hewouldn't be using that [directly implying he wrote the passage] as a punishment for an allegedly false messiah if he thought shit was unpleasant, eh?
It was implied in the other guys comment and explicit in mine.
First you claim that I am dishonest for leaving it out, then it turns out that no such thing every existed, and you say that it was "implied". No, it wasn't. Neither you nor your fellow Nazi implied that.
I do believe that Maimonides fellow said this[did you mean to use a colon here?]. Here's a question: he wouldn't be using that [directly implying he wrote the passage] as a punishment for an allegedly false messiah if he thought shit was unpleasant, eh?
Yes? I talked about what I knew. The argument is equally applicable to any other author, and it seems to be quite solid, because you'd be addressing it instead of talking about that batty old Spaniard. Clearly, you cannot.
Oh?
Someone you were defending, yes.
Now we're getting somewhere. I do believe that Maimonides fellow said this. Here's a question: he wouldn't be using that as a punishment for an allegedly false messiah if he thought shit was unpleasant, eh? So it's rather strange to use that as an argument for why "Jews love shit".
Some may, and those that do may be condemned for that. But you'd rather condemn Jews as a whole, and I don't agree with that.
You think Maimonides wrote this? Are you fucking retarded dude? It says the author in the text itself, Onkelos
BTW, Nice job trimming out “scatological humor” from both my and the other guys argument you disingenuous hack. As I stated previously:
Here’s someone proud of their jewish tradition of scat worship:
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/community/articles/the-butt-of-the-joke
You mean “observant jews”? Because the talmud isn’t a “take it or leave it” kinda thing.
Learn to read, retard. I'm not familiar with any Talmud. I am familiar with some things that Maimonides wrote, specifically because I think Hitchens quoted it in his book.
"Jews LOVE scat"
Funny, can you point me to where you see "ological humor" here?
I don't like toilet humor. Unfortunately, nearly everyone in the West does, Jewish or not.
Ask 10 random observant Jews what they think happened to Jesus. I don't think many of them would say that. As you say, the Talmud is not a take it or leave it, at least as I understand it. More of an interpretation of their holy books.
It was implied in the other guys comment and explicit in mine.
Here’s what you said about Maimonides btw:
/> I do believe that Maimonides fellow said this[did you mean to use a colon here?]. Here's a question: he wouldn't be using that [directly implying he wrote the passage] as a punishment for an allegedly false messiah if he thought shit was unpleasant, eh?
First you claim that I am dishonest for leaving it out, then it turns out that no such thing every existed, and you say that it was "implied". No, it wasn't. Neither you nor your fellow Nazi implied that.
Yes? I talked about what I knew. The argument is equally applicable to any other author, and it seems to be quite solid, because you'd be addressing it instead of talking about that batty old Spaniard. Clearly, you cannot.