It was implied in the other guys comment and explicit in mine.
Here’s what you said about Maimonides btw:
/> I do believe that Maimonides fellow said this[did you mean to use a colon here?]. Here's a question: hewouldn't be using that [directly implying he wrote the passage] as a punishment for an allegedly false messiah if he thought shit was unpleasant, eh?
It was implied in the other guys comment and explicit in mine.
First you claim that I am dishonest for leaving it out, then it turns out that no such thing every existed, and you say that it was "implied". No, it wasn't. Neither you nor your fellow Nazi implied that.
I do believe that Maimonides fellow said this[did you mean to use a colon here?]. Here's a question: he wouldn't be using that [directly implying he wrote the passage] as a punishment for an allegedly false messiah if he thought shit was unpleasant, eh?
Yes? I talked about what I knew. The argument is equally applicable to any other author, and it seems to be quite solid, because you'd be addressing it instead of talking about that batty old Spaniard. Clearly, you cannot.
Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles one's hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a solid mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to give in to your argument, on account of the observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. Antonio would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened.
Ttyl antoniowski, until your next pile of horse shit which I stumble across
Lmfao facts don’t need defending - it’s your lies which fall apart upon the slightest prodding:
/> First you claim that I am dishonest for leaving it out, then it turns out that no such thing every existed, and you say that it was "implied". No, it wasn't. Neither you nor your fellow Nazi implied that.
He says it plain as day right here dipshit:
Jews LOVE scat. The famous joke, "The Aristocrats" has been done by many jews because it's so jewish and they love it.
You see Jellymann? Let’s see you worm your way out of this one
It was implied in the other guys comment and explicit in mine.
Here’s what you said about Maimonides btw:
/> I do believe that Maimonides fellow said this[did you mean to use a colon here?]. Here's a question: he wouldn't be using that [directly implying he wrote the passage] as a punishment for an allegedly false messiah if he thought shit was unpleasant, eh?
First you claim that I am dishonest for leaving it out, then it turns out that no such thing every existed, and you say that it was "implied". No, it wasn't. Neither you nor your fellow Nazi implied that.
Yes? I talked about what I knew. The argument is equally applicable to any other author, and it seems to be quite solid, because you'd be addressing it instead of talking about that batty old Spaniard. Clearly, you cannot.
Ttyl antoniowski, until your next pile of horse shit which I stumble across
I see you have nothing to say in your defense.
And Antoniowski - I'm Russian or Jewish?
Lmfao facts don’t need defending - it’s your lies which fall apart upon the slightest prodding:
/> First you claim that I am dishonest for leaving it out, then it turns out that no such thing every existed, and you say that it was "implied". No, it wasn't. Neither you nor your fellow Nazi implied that.
He says it plain as day right here dipshit:
You see Jellymann? Let’s see you worm your way out of this one