You cannot be both "Pro Law and Order" and "Pro FBI"
(nitter.net)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
He replied to someone who said reform is impossible and to dissolve it:
I'm not sure what to make of his true position. Could he just be advocating an actionable step?
You're assuming there is in fact a true position beyond mealy-mouthed statism.
"Yes, this organisation operates outside of the law and abuses people on the regular and that makes them evil............ but if My Team™ were in control of all this power, it would suddenly make them good and reformed!"
It's the hallmark distinction of a statist: they rarely (if ever) want to do away with power when it's used for evil, merely "reform" it by putting their people in charge and continuing the status quo.
Reform is a word that is meaningless without contrition.
They're not sorry, they will do it again, reform is not possible. Only punishment.
Based. Wish more people on our side would nut up and realize this
Honestly even if we scatter it to the winds they still need punishment. We almost need another bureau solely tasked with investigating and prosecuting the FBI, and then for that one to disappear too.
He's saying that if you cannot amend the Constitution to create an FBI, then you need to get rid of it.
The FBI's existence clearly violates so many fucking parts of the Constitution any Congress, even the most neocons and neoliberals would not be able to vote for it in good faith unless they themselves are living off of the teat of the FBI (which many are).