No, incentivizing riotous behavior by running apologetics for it, and funding it with a welfare state is not a solution.
Nor is mass execution of French-Algiers because they are part Algerian, and some crazy yankee has decided that killing all Algerians is a categorical imperative.
No, you should not declare gun free zones, because the French have a right to defend themselves from terrorism.
You can stop fucking lying right now. I've always stated that everyone has the right to self defense. Including from you.
White people should defend themselves when attacked. I have zero problems with lynchers or looters getting shot. Particularly racialists ones that want to commit an ethnic cleansing. I don't even have a moral objection to shooting people over grievous property damage.
Which is why I said this:
the French have a right to defend themselves from terrorism.
You being ignorant doesn't change reality. Stop lying.
You respect property rights but do not object to legal immigration, yes? And what if the only people “legally” coming to your country belong to demographics who will inevitably erode and challenge property rights?
The only reason for their invasions and their marauding is because the French state lets them. The correct solution is to: have a fucking border and control immigration.
There isn't much else that even needs to be done. Just behave like a real country.
That would be pretty fucking stupid since they want the migrants to leave. Even in war, if you win, you still have to remove the remaining troops. If you don't have money to take them back, you'll end up having them becoming a large portion of your population. Like the Americans did with the Germans when they were abandoned here after the Revolutionary War.
Besides, France is already paying billions of dollars to bring them.
Except that's a lie peddled by Globalists, which is why when the Rawandan Plan in the UK was announced illegal immigration dropped to zero for a few days. This is because deterrence works just fine, and you should stop literally paying for your military ships to transport them to your country.
It costs much more to drag every single warm body you can from across the world to drive down wages in your country, than it does to repel borders.
Jesus fucking Christ you psychos.
No, incentivizing riotous behavior by running apologetics for it, and funding it with a welfare state is not a solution.
Nor is mass execution of French-Algiers because they are part Algerian, and some crazy yankee has decided that killing all Algerians is a categorical imperative.
No, you should not declare gun free zones, because the French have a right to defend themselves from terrorism.
Gizortnik is very much against the notion of white people defending themselves when attacked.
Doesn't he also think having a French passport makes you French and race doesn't matter?
No. From a different comment:
"That basically takes us to today. This is one of the reasons you can't find sympathetic Algerians to the French plight. This is why there is a malicious streak in their commentary. The civilizational divide between French Catholicism and African Islamism so extreme, and has resulted in so much bloodshed and hatred, that these people really can't live with each other."
You have to integrate people into your values system in a Civic National Liberal Republic. If you don't, they have can't stay here.
You can stop fucking lying right now. I've always stated that everyone has the right to self defense. Including from you.
White people should defend themselves when attacked. I have zero problems with lynchers or looters getting shot. Particularly racialists ones that want to commit an ethnic cleansing. I don't even have a moral objection to shooting people over grievous property damage.
Which is why I said this:
You being ignorant doesn't change reality. Stop lying.
You respect property rights but do not object to legal immigration, yes? And what if the only people “legally” coming to your country belong to demographics who will inevitably erode and challenge property rights?
The dirt isn’t magic.
Easy solution: deport illegals.
The only reason for their invasions and their marauding is because the French state lets them. The correct solution is to: have a fucking border and control immigration.
There isn't much else that even needs to be done. Just behave like a real country.
what if france doesn't feel like paying for the processing and transportation of its invaders?
That would be pretty fucking stupid since they want the migrants to leave. Even in war, if you win, you still have to remove the remaining troops. If you don't have money to take them back, you'll end up having them becoming a large portion of your population. Like the Americans did with the Germans when they were abandoned here after the Revolutionary War.
Besides, France is already paying billions of dollars to bring them.
Apparently it's very costly and nothing apparently stops them from returning to commit even more crimes.
Except that's a lie peddled by Globalists, which is why when the Rawandan Plan in the UK was announced illegal immigration dropped to zero for a few days. This is because deterrence works just fine, and you should stop literally paying for your military ships to transport them to your country.
It costs much more to drag every single warm body you can from across the world to drive down wages in your country, than it does to repel borders.
Walls work.