Have you noticed any patterns among those immigrants who seemingly cannot be integrated?
Yes, they are normally the most degenerate scum of the Earth that the government refuses to filter out, because it's hoping you appeal to the government for protection against the monsters they look to let in. Anachro-Tyranny both helps subdue the general population, and also make the population appeal to government violence. It's a win-win if the state plays it's cards right.
Have you noticed any patterns among those who push for this immigration despite knowing full well that integration is impossible?
They are elites who understand that there is incredible value in crushing everyone into ultra-dense cities, segregated by every available topical line, and balkanizing the population into rotating blocks of political power that can be kept in line with a party-boss system.
That's where you EthnoNats keep getting lost on. The elites are globalists. They don't give a shit about anyone. They only have a loyalty to themselves and their ideology. They'd kill their own family if it could make them money and guarantee their power.
They don't want to totally replace anyone, and they damn sure don't want homogeneity of any kind. They want a balkanized society that needs the government to "keep the peace" between groups. And to keep each group locked into a party-boss system that claims to represent their collective interest. If they could (like with the Romans), they'd divide people by sport team. Anything to keep the balkanized from unifying.
At least you’ve stayed announcing the civic nationalism in your threads.
I've always been a Civic Nationalist, I've never said otherwise. I'm an American. It's what we are based on: a Liberal Philosophical Revolutionary Republic. I'm also a Minarchist Militarist.
You can stop fucking lying right now. I've always stated that everyone has the right to self defense. Including from you.
White people should defend themselves when attacked. I have zero problems with lynchers or looters getting shot. Particularly racialists ones that want to commit an ethnic cleansing. I don't even have a moral objection to shooting people over grievous property damage.
Which is why I said this:
the French have a right to defend themselves from terrorism.
You being ignorant doesn't change reality. Stop lying.
You respect property rights but do not object to legal immigration, yes? And what if the only people “legally” coming to your country belong to demographics who will inevitably erode and challenge property rights?
From the other post you replied to: You have to integrate people into your values system in a Civic National Liberal Republic.
If they aren't going to integrate, they can piss off. If they don't share our values, they don't belong here. Those property rights are based on the refusal to use coercion to take what you want. If they can't accept that, they've announced their intent to engage in aggression.
A good legal immigration system would have that as a minimum.
As for good mass legal migration, no such thing exists. All mass migration ends with colonization, because mass migrants can't integrate. Any immigrant must be so rare in number that they are always pioneers into the host country. They can't isolate themselves into their own communities. They must assimilate into the host culture, integrate into the community, and build families within that community with community members.
As such, a mass migration system is always bad because it's impossible to integrate with too large of a number. For a country as large of the US (300 million people or so). That might be as small as 10,000 a year, legal and illegal combined.
Gizortnik is very much against the notion of white people defending themselves when attacked.
Doesn't he also think having a French passport makes you French and race doesn't matter?
No. From a different comment:
"That basically takes us to today. This is one of the reasons you can't find sympathetic Algerians to the French plight. This is why there is a malicious streak in their commentary. The civilizational divide between French Catholicism and African Islamism so extreme, and has resulted in so much bloodshed and hatred, that these people really can't live with each other."
You have to integrate people into your values system in a Civic National Liberal Republic. If you don't, they have can't stay here.
Have you noticed any patterns among those immigrants who seemingly cannot be integrated?
Have you noticed any patterns among those who push for this immigration despite knowing full well that integration is impossible?
At least you’ve stayed announcing the civic nationalism in your threads.
Yes, they are normally the most degenerate scum of the Earth that the government refuses to filter out, because it's hoping you appeal to the government for protection against the monsters they look to let in. Anachro-Tyranny both helps subdue the general population, and also make the population appeal to government violence. It's a win-win if the state plays it's cards right.
They are elites who understand that there is incredible value in crushing everyone into ultra-dense cities, segregated by every available topical line, and balkanizing the population into rotating blocks of political power that can be kept in line with a party-boss system.
That's where you EthnoNats keep getting lost on. The elites are globalists. They don't give a shit about anyone. They only have a loyalty to themselves and their ideology. They'd kill their own family if it could make them money and guarantee their power.
They don't want to totally replace anyone, and they damn sure don't want homogeneity of any kind. They want a balkanized society that needs the government to "keep the peace" between groups. And to keep each group locked into a party-boss system that claims to represent their collective interest. If they could (like with the Romans), they'd divide people by sport team. Anything to keep the balkanized from unifying.
I've always been a Civic Nationalist, I've never said otherwise. I'm an American. It's what we are based on: a Liberal Philosophical Revolutionary Republic. I'm also a Minarchist Militarist.
You can stop fucking lying right now. I've always stated that everyone has the right to self defense. Including from you.
White people should defend themselves when attacked. I have zero problems with lynchers or looters getting shot. Particularly racialists ones that want to commit an ethnic cleansing. I don't even have a moral objection to shooting people over grievous property damage.
Which is why I said this:
You being ignorant doesn't change reality. Stop lying.
You respect property rights but do not object to legal immigration, yes? And what if the only people “legally” coming to your country belong to demographics who will inevitably erode and challenge property rights?
The dirt isn’t magic.
From the other post you replied to: You have to integrate people into your values system in a Civic National Liberal Republic.
If they aren't going to integrate, they can piss off. If they don't share our values, they don't belong here. Those property rights are based on the refusal to use coercion to take what you want. If they can't accept that, they've announced their intent to engage in aggression.
A good legal immigration system would have that as a minimum.
As for good mass legal migration, no such thing exists. All mass migration ends with colonization, because mass migrants can't integrate. Any immigrant must be so rare in number that they are always pioneers into the host country. They can't isolate themselves into their own communities. They must assimilate into the host culture, integrate into the community, and build families within that community with community members.
As such, a mass migration system is always bad because it's impossible to integrate with too large of a number. For a country as large of the US (300 million people or so). That might be as small as 10,000 a year, legal and illegal combined.
There are millions of them here and millions more arrive every year. They will only piss off if made to piss off by force of arms.
Solutions aren't pretty and won't fit into your naive idealism.
What we ought to be discussing at this point is mass repatriation.