So I just finished a stint working security for a men's shelter (thank fucking Christ they're finally sending me somewhere else). I dealt with almost every single one of the several hundred residents there on a daily basis because it was my job to check them for contraband. As I'm sure you can imagine it was a shithole, but that didn't stop FtM trannies from staying there. There were a couple of them, and only one passed well enough for my suspicions to remain suspicions. It was blatantly obvious with the others. One didn't do a fucking thing to pass. The other guard even asked me if they allow women, and before I could answer she announced that she identifies as a man. Like I said in the title, you almost have to admire how far some of them will go with their LARPing. There's no benefit in accessing a men's shelter as a woman unless she's prostituting herself (and the one who's blatantly a woman is ugly as fuck). The women's shelters suck way less because our gynocentric society actually values women. It's amazing what trannies will do to convince themselves and others that they're really their pretend sex. Gender ideology is one hell of a drug.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
The men aren't being "taken care of". The shelter has retarded rules that can interfere with sane people getting back onto their feet. The schizos and junkies on the other hand are free to shit the place up as long as they're not brazen enough to do it in front of someone who gives a shit.
That's sad. In Seattle we had a few close down with promises to upgrade, and then nothing happened. I guess this is the other angle.
Unfortunately, that's always the inevitable result.
Men can't be taken care of if they are going to succeed. They have to make themselves stronger. Is it possible to make their lives better? Maybe, but they're the only ones that can really do it.
That's why I'm kind of out of the whole "Men's Rights" concept. I think it's operating entirely from the wrong perspective. We actually need Men's Conquest. We need men to conquer over adversary and establish a place of dominance and respect for themselves in society, with women who can inspire and rejuvenate them. None of that can come from women, and it can only come from men who are going to be aggressive enough to never take one step inside a Men's Shelter.
In this case all the shelter needs to do is grant exceptions to their curfew if someone has a job. It's less about taking care of them and more about not deliberately putting obstacles in their way. I think that's what Men's Rights tries to tackle, but I agree that they've been going about it the wrong way. Approaching the feminist regime from a point of weakness and asking nicely for recognition of male humanity clearly isn't working. More aggression is needed as you say, but also a willingness to take no deal over a bad deal and let it burn if that's what it comes down to, which it probability will considering how the feminists are used to being handed their way on a silver platter.
That's part of the problem. Feminists were handed the power they were by men, who were doing something men love to do: appease women. In fact, (you probably know this but I'll throw it out there for the audience) the origins of Feminism were based on the perspective that a society should be judged on how it treats it's women; and that women were not being treated kindly enough by society in the 1800's. First wave Feminism sought to remove women from the coal mines because they saw them as places where women had to struggle and demean themselves. Second wave Feminism sought to put them back in the coal mines, because they had forgotten that it wasn't the patriarchy, but they themselves who removed women in the first place.
However, appeasing women works well as a form of loving communication (like gift giving), but it CAN NOT be the medium you use to communicate with all women, and women will grow quickly resentful of it anyway.
Women today are stuck in a hard point where the men around them are weak, the feminists around them are pushing them to be men, and they are told that they need to be more masculine and powerful, while actually wanting a man who can overpower them, but also not abuse them. No surprise when you start trying to pry into what a woman thinks she wants, she sounds like a confused duck hit on the head with a mallet.
Women, more than ever, need strong men to tear up the Feminist-imposed social contract society that has been build to corporatize and de-family women. Women want those bonds and obligations of sentiment that they can only get from a man committed to a relationship with them; but women have no knowledge or capacity to make the kind of strong, aggressive, dominant man that they want. It's also one of the reasons that women resort to violent or abusive men, because they think that's what a strong masculine presence looks like.
Women, unfortunately, are of no help in this. The men have to fix themselves, and they can't even do it together. The only way to be the kind of strong, confident, integrous, aggressive man that men, women, children, and civilization need is to do it ourselves. Another man can only be a guidepost, or an advice giver, but the man's struggle will be entirely personal. All women can do in that fight, is be the man's inspiration, his rejuvenation, or a social navigator. ... but he's never even going to get those without stepping up first.
I honestly wish I had better news, but it ain't there. The only good news I have is that it is achievable.