This is the flip side of the incel problem. Celebrities and pro athletes and the like love to reap the benefits of a hypergamous society when it suits them, but when it comes back to bite them and all of these unattached clout seeking women and beta males tear them apart they cry about it. That's just how it goes when you play this game.
Does he expect the 80% of men that women rate as below average to jump to his defense? The huge middle ground of people who only have a handful of partners in their life to identify with his struggle to bed 100s of women and manage the consequences?
Top heavy hierarchies lead inevitably to violent downfalls. This is why the institution of marriage was invented. People figured this out tens of thousands of years ago. We're going to have to figure it out again.
Yep. "Players" are society-ruining scum and deserve everything bad that happens to them. He could have just taken his pick and lived happily ever after, but no, he had to be a degenerate. Enjoy the whirlwind, retard.
"He [the devil] always sends errors into the world in pairs—pairs of opposites. And he always encourages us to spend a lot of time thinking which is the worse. You see why, of course? He relies on your extra dislike of the one error to draw you gradually into the opposite one. But do not let us be fooled. We have to keep our eyes on the goal and go straight through between both errors. We have no other concern than that with either of them. "
Tate got most of his money and power by literally running a camgirl empire, openly talking about how they manipulated lonely simps for maximum profit.
Most PUAs are selfish and only in it for themselves, but otherwise their only crime against other men is being able to steal their girl or not caring about them. Tate specifically however actively hurt men for his entire career and then tried to sell himself as their savior.
He is many steps below them in every moral sense, and the world is an actual worse place for his existence.
Yup, never heard accusations against Roger Federer because he simply stayed with the same woman. He got lucky in that his career took a few years to catapult from good to best of his generation, and thus found a good wife before he was super rich and famous.
Still, guys like Ronaldo never would have been content with someone like Federer's wife because in her prime she wasn't even an 8 on the looks scale. Still, any wise man would take a 6 who loves him, isn't a gold digger, and is happy to stay home and raise his kids, over the risk of most of the smoke shows.
Bachelorhood, whether by choice, involuntarily or short-term relationships via PUA are a minority thing. The rhetoric on dating is made up of two minorities - the promiscuous ten percent and the long term single ten per cent. The rest will have had one partner, maybe two after a break-up within the period of a year. The vast majority of people find a long-term partner in time offline on online via closed social groups (not predominately via online dating) or and don't relate to this lifestyle. If anything, there is a backlash in progress. One example, DarkMatter2525's video on the "red pill" in recent days. Critics of bachelorhood need to ask themselves why marriage was invented when we created civilisation?
This is the flip side of the incel problem. Celebrities and pro athletes and the like love to reap the benefits of a hypergamous society when it suits them, but when it comes back to bite them and all of these unattached clout seeking women and beta males tear them apart they cry about it. That's just how it goes when you play this game.
Does he expect the 80% of men that women rate as below average to jump to his defense? The huge middle ground of people who only have a handful of partners in their life to identify with his struggle to bed 100s of women and manage the consequences?
Top heavy hierarchies lead inevitably to violent downfalls. This is why the institution of marriage was invented. People figured this out tens of thousands of years ago. We're going to have to figure it out again.
Yep. "Players" are society-ruining scum and deserve everything bad that happens to them. He could have just taken his pick and lived happily ever after, but no, he had to be a degenerate. Enjoy the whirlwind, retard.
"He [the devil] always sends errors into the world in pairs—pairs of opposites. And he always encourages us to spend a lot of time thinking which is the worse. You see why, of course? He relies on your extra dislike of the one error to draw you gradually into the opposite one. But do not let us be fooled. We have to keep our eyes on the goal and go straight through between both errors. We have no other concern than that with either of them. "
C.S. Lewis
I feel like i need to read more of C.S. Lewis because every quote i have heard from the man is absolutely based.
Holy fuck, that’s a good thought. So many modern dichotomies it could be applied to.
Tate got most of his money and power by literally running a camgirl empire, openly talking about how they manipulated lonely simps for maximum profit.
Most PUAs are selfish and only in it for themselves, but otherwise their only crime against other men is being able to steal their girl or not caring about them. Tate specifically however actively hurt men for his entire career and then tried to sell himself as their savior.
He is many steps below them in every moral sense, and the world is an actual worse place for his existence.
Yup, never heard accusations against Roger Federer because he simply stayed with the same woman. He got lucky in that his career took a few years to catapult from good to best of his generation, and thus found a good wife before he was super rich and famous.
Still, guys like Ronaldo never would have been content with someone like Federer's wife because in her prime she wasn't even an 8 on the looks scale. Still, any wise man would take a 6 who loves him, isn't a gold digger, and is happy to stay home and raise his kids, over the risk of most of the smoke shows.
"When you play the game of thrones, you win or you die. There is no middle ground."
Yes, he actually does LOL. Because he's got a bunch of simps who pay him money.
Marriage serves both women, & non-hypergamous men. They all ganged up on & smashed the hypergamous men in order to bring stability.
The Left fucked it all up by throwing out traditional values. The answer, as always, is to destroy the Left & purge it from society as degenerate.
Bachelorhood, whether by choice, involuntarily or short-term relationships via PUA are a minority thing. The rhetoric on dating is made up of two minorities - the promiscuous ten percent and the long term single ten per cent. The rest will have had one partner, maybe two after a break-up within the period of a year. The vast majority of people find a long-term partner in time offline on online via closed social groups (not predominately via online dating) or and don't relate to this lifestyle. If anything, there is a backlash in progress. One example, DarkMatter2525's video on the "red pill" in recent days. Critics of bachelorhood need to ask themselves why marriage was invented when we created civilisation?