They never fired him. They removed him from air, barred him from company email, but kept paying him. The idea was to keep him silent through 2024 because he was leaning too far Trumpwards and Fox is pushing De Santis.
The conflict now is over whether it was him or them who first breached the contract. They are trying to enforce a non-compete, but apparently Twitter was never listed as a "competitor" so it looks like they've fucked up their silencing gambit entirely.
The bullshit semantics of "we didn't fire you, we're just removing you from your job" is infuriating. Stop acting like a lawyer and start acting like a man.
Will you apologize when the suit abruptly fails and he endorses DeSimptis in the primary?
I've noticed the enemy's tactics regarding plants have gotten way smarter. They now fake a rift between the plant and the establishment to give them more credibility.
Because I'll be proven right. Again. Nobody ever goes back and checks if I was right on these things. This week validated literally everything I have been saying. The left deserted the gays, women's organizations admitted using financial pressure to push men out of work, TERFs got on the media's good side.
Remember when I said everyone would fall in line with the women's movement when it came down to it?
Pride under attack
Soros, Ford Foundation drop support for LGBT causes, raise their commitment to women
AP puts out guidelines on how to fairly report on TERFs
Here's an interesting fact, not for any reason at all. The person who led the first meeting of what became the WEF had the same surname (Galbraith) as Rowling's alter ego.
And if he didn't pick an instance where fox is clearly going extremely far left, so getting rid of someone who's more conservative (Tucker) makes sense in that context, and if he didn't blame DeSantis (because... DeSantis controls fox, but DeSantis is controlled by women?), and...
He just needs to make rational points instead of deranged rants, but he's fairly incapable of it, and I'm sure one day he's going to become a tranny since what he does is exactly what he accuses women of doing.
Lolwut.
Fox literally removed him from air, and fired him but tried to keep him quiet and there's a lawsuit about it.
How are you this retarded?
They never fired him. They removed him from air, barred him from company email, but kept paying him. The idea was to keep him silent through 2024 because he was leaning too far Trumpwards and Fox is pushing De Santis.
The conflict now is over whether it was him or them who first breached the contract. They are trying to enforce a non-compete, but apparently Twitter was never listed as a "competitor" so it looks like they've fucked up their silencing gambit entirely.
The bullshit semantics of "we didn't fire you, we're just removing you from your job" is infuriating. Stop acting like a lawyer and start acting like a man.
Which is... Effectively firing him. They're just trying to keep him stuck in limbo.
If you want to quibble over technicalities, we can, but realistically... They fired him.
Will you apologize when the suit abruptly fails and he endorses DeSimptis in the primary?
I've noticed the enemy's tactics regarding plants have gotten way smarter. They now fake a rift between the plant and the establishment to give them more credibility.
Why would I apologize? You're making shit up to justify your insane retarded positions, and you're divorced from reality.
Because I'll be proven right. Again. Nobody ever goes back and checks if I was right on these things. This week validated literally everything I have been saying. The left deserted the gays, women's organizations admitted using financial pressure to push men out of work, TERFs got on the media's good side.
Remember when I said everyone would fall in line with the women's movement when it came down to it?
Pride under attack
Soros, Ford Foundation drop support for LGBT causes, raise their commitment to women
AP puts out guidelines on how to fairly report on TERFs
Here's an interesting fact, not for any reason at all. The person who led the first meeting of what became the WEF had the same surname (Galbraith) as Rowling's alter ego.
Downvotes don't change that I was right.
If you got rid of the anti-women angle, a lot of people here would agree with you.
And if he didn't pick an instance where fox is clearly going extremely far left, so getting rid of someone who's more conservative (Tucker) makes sense in that context, and if he didn't blame DeSantis (because... DeSantis controls fox, but DeSantis is controlled by women?), and...
He just needs to make rational points instead of deranged rants, but he's fairly incapable of it, and I'm sure one day he's going to become a tranny since what he does is exactly what he accuses women of doing.
Impy could acts like a woman but I don’t see how he could turns into one. Him waking up as a woman is probably his worst nightmare.