They didn't "bomb civilians" they bombed what was thought at the time to be important roads, communications routes, and military industrial targets. The civilians were collateral damage, this was not a suicide bomber blowing up a school.
They're not the same thing, and the fixation om Dresden is just so odd. All of the civilian deaths in the war, from the Rape of Nanking, to the nukes and crazy shit the Russians did not to mention the death camps and a bombing of a city late in the war is what people fixate on?
Dresden wasn't anywhere near the first or last city to be carpet bombed in the war by either side.
Of course, that's total war for you. And of course I'm not one, but a leftist like you wouldn't know the difference.
You think mass murdering civilians is justified? I guess you're at least consistent.
They didn't "bomb civilians" they bombed what was thought at the time to be important roads, communications routes, and military industrial targets. The civilians were collateral damage, this was not a suicide bomber blowing up a school.
They're not the same thing, and the fixation om Dresden is just so odd. All of the civilian deaths in the war, from the Rape of Nanking, to the nukes and crazy shit the Russians did not to mention the death camps and a bombing of a city late in the war is what people fixate on?
Dresden wasn't anywhere near the first or last city to be carpet bombed in the war by either side.
I think bombing in war is justified yes. I think the concept of a "war crime" is childish leftist nonsense that has no place in reality either.