They didn't "bomb civilians" they bombed what was thought at the time to be important roads, communications routes, and military industrial targets. The civilians were collateral damage, this was not a suicide bomber blowing up a school.
They're not the same thing, and the fixation om Dresden is just so odd. All of the civilian deaths in the war, from the Rape of Nanking, to the nukes and crazy shit the Russians did not to mention the death camps and a bombing of a city late in the war is what people fixate on?
Dresden wasn't anywhere near the first or last city to be carpet bombed in the war by either side.
I am aware, and it's not just the US, as Winston Churchill famously (supposedly) said that 'sodomy' is one of the traditions of the Royal Navy.
But I'm not relying on stereotypes, but on actions. Folks in the navy are putting their own life on the line. The same cannot be said for air force operators and particularly drone operators.
Hi there, actual veteran here. Worked alongside the Navy many times.
No they're not. They're not the safest branch of the military but that's mostly because of electrical and mechanical accidents. You're talking out your ass.
It's been too long since we have had a war with anyone approaching a peer force. People forget that planes and helicopter can be shot down and ships sunk, when you're fighting someone with anywhere approaching the same level of tech.
It doesn't take being a vet to realize that basic truth.
Which is correct, but it doesn't have a thing to do with what he was talking about. It's true that the united states has lost war fighting potential due to focusing on counter insurgency rather than conventional warfare.
But Antonio on the other hand was just chestbeating as though he has the slightest clue about branch differences within the military.
I'm not saying we've lost any effectiveness necessarily, just that a lot of civilians, like myself, have lost all prospective on how dangerous and deadly war can actually be. If you don't make military history a hobby, you forget how bad it actually gets. Sure the navy is safe now, because insurgents don't have a navy, but it'll be a lot less safe when a bigger threat presents itself.
Hard to tell as it could be there's enough gays in the military for this to happen, or a hardcore version of hazing or a bet gone too far. It's REALLY too close to call.
Wasn’t the Airforce working on some kind of secret gay bomb experiment? I guess it succeeded.
The Air Force is the last service branch that would need a gay bomb. Raining death on people from the air in such a cowardly manner makes you gay.
This is among the stupider takes I've seen from you.
You must be the first Nazi to defend the destruction of Dresden then.
Of course, that's total war for you. And of course I'm not one, but a leftist like you wouldn't know the difference.
You think mass murdering civilians is justified? I guess you're at least consistent.
They didn't "bomb civilians" they bombed what was thought at the time to be important roads, communications routes, and military industrial targets. The civilians were collateral damage, this was not a suicide bomber blowing up a school.
They're not the same thing, and the fixation om Dresden is just so odd. All of the civilian deaths in the war, from the Rape of Nanking, to the nukes and crazy shit the Russians did not to mention the death camps and a bombing of a city late in the war is what people fixate on?
Dresden wasn't anywhere near the first or last city to be carpet bombed in the war by either side.
I think bombing in war is justified yes. I think the concept of a "war crime" is childish leftist nonsense that has no place in reality either.
I am aware, and it's not just the US, as Winston Churchill famously (supposedly) said that 'sodomy' is one of the traditions of the Royal Navy.
But I'm not relying on stereotypes, but on actions. Folks in the navy are putting their own life on the line. The same cannot be said for air force operators and particularly drone operators.
Hi there, actual veteran here. Worked alongside the Navy many times.
No they're not. They're not the safest branch of the military but that's mostly because of electrical and mechanical accidents. You're talking out your ass.
It's been too long since we have had a war with anyone approaching a peer force. People forget that planes and helicopter can be shot down and ships sunk, when you're fighting someone with anywhere approaching the same level of tech.
It doesn't take being a vet to realize that basic truth.
Which is correct, but it doesn't have a thing to do with what he was talking about. It's true that the united states has lost war fighting potential due to focusing on counter insurgency rather than conventional warfare.
But Antonio on the other hand was just chestbeating as though he has the slightest clue about branch differences within the military.
He doesn't. He's a foreigner and a faggot.
I'm not saying we've lost any effectiveness necessarily, just that a lot of civilians, like myself, have lost all prospective on how dangerous and deadly war can actually be. If you don't make military history a hobby, you forget how bad it actually gets. Sure the navy is safe now, because insurgents don't have a navy, but it'll be a lot less safe when a bigger threat presents itself.
So not enemy fire, like I said.
The exact opposite of what you said, retard. The Navy is almost perfectly safe save for accidents, that's the point.
I'm glad R Lee Ermey didn't survive to have to witness this.
Even I, as a Russian nationalist and FSB officer (according to a paranoid poster here) have nothing but admiration for Gunnery Sergeant Hartman.
Hard to tell as it could be there's enough gays in the military for this to happen, or a hardcore version of hazing or a bet gone too far. It's REALLY too close to call.
Seems like a joke and/or hazing just based on the reaction.
But it doesn't speak well of the army of the Rainbow Empire.
As I said hard to say especially if money is involved.
I've seen Jackass to know what guys are capable of doing for just tv money..
Pink Empire.