That's true, but strong policing and incarceration policies work. Actually they worked so well that people forgot why they were needed in the first place.
Cops are like any other employee, they will choose the path of least resistance unless forced into it.
Of course they work, by violating your rights. If you want to live in a country where you do not have a right to not be searched without probable cause please go live there. This, however, is the US where we do have that right. I'd like to be able to exercise it without police entitlement requiring me to get a lawyer to prove that my rights have been violated after the fact. It's complete and utter bullshit that the default position in this country of rights is that anyone can walk all over them and it's up to me to spend ridiculous amounts of money to lawyer up and prove that my rights were indeed violated.
LE should be terrified of violating my rights. But instead, I have to be fearful of exercising them under penalty of police reprisals.
Of course they work, by violating your rights. If you want to live in a country where you do not have a right to not be searched without probable cause please go live there.
We moved on from stop and frisk, I'm talking about predictive policing, strong investigation, bigger PDs, broken windows theory, stronger sentencing, etc.
Yes we know cash seizure is a scam if you were thinking of that
Id like to walk ina city without the risk of being murdered or looted by blm unlike you blm worshipping cuck. Blacks happen to commit most crime but you simp for them
Stop simping for blm criminal vermin, the other option is what you enabled by letting blm burn loot murder. Stop and frisk made ny safe and it only targetted criminals but of coarse blm worshiping retards like you are mad because it hit blacks who happened to be most criminals
If you aggressively shut their crime down, you can actually have a safe and clean city. See NYC after stop-and-frisk did its job.
Stop and frisk is unconstitutional. IDC how effective it is. I'm not submitting to a search when officers have no probable cause.
Besides, cops don't want to go after real criminals anyway.
That's true, but strong policing and incarceration policies work. Actually they worked so well that people forgot why they were needed in the first place.
Cops are like any other employee, they will choose the path of least resistance unless forced into it.
Of course they work, by violating your rights. If you want to live in a country where you do not have a right to not be searched without probable cause please go live there. This, however, is the US where we do have that right. I'd like to be able to exercise it without police entitlement requiring me to get a lawyer to prove that my rights have been violated after the fact. It's complete and utter bullshit that the default position in this country of rights is that anyone can walk all over them and it's up to me to spend ridiculous amounts of money to lawyer up and prove that my rights were indeed violated.
LE should be terrified of violating my rights. But instead, I have to be fearful of exercising them under penalty of police reprisals.
We moved on from stop and frisk, I'm talking about predictive policing, strong investigation, bigger PDs, broken windows theory, stronger sentencing, etc.
Yes we know cash seizure is a scam if you were thinking of that
Id like to walk ina city without the risk of being murdered or looted by blm unlike you blm worshipping cuck. Blacks happen to commit most crime but you simp for them
Stop simping for blm criminal vermin, the other option is what you enabled by letting blm burn loot murder. Stop and frisk made ny safe and it only targetted criminals but of coarse blm worshiping retards like you are mad because it hit blacks who happened to be most criminals
You don't have to unless you don't change your smoke alarm's batteries