Drinker is the “diet” alternative critic. He acknowledges that the movie shits all over the established straight white male legacy character but goes on to call it brilliant anyways. The takeaway is that movies are apparently allowed to be blatantly anti-white as long as they are ostensibly “good”.
The whole EFAP crew is the same. They are disillusioned leftists who refuse to recognize that leftism is at the heart of our dysfunctional media. It’s honestly painful to watch sometimes. A bunch of supposedly insightful film critics complaining about the incompetence of writers and directors who are operating on pure ideology. You think feminists give a shit about plot holes or flat character arcs?
It was always gonna go downhill once Wolf left. He was a PoS in plenty of his own ways, but he was angry and autistic enough to call everyone, even his friends, on their shit. Its no surprise once he was off, Rags was able to run his mouth wantonly and every "debate" became a lot of dogpiling each other until you agreed with him.
And now that all of them are "established" they don't want to rock the boat too much and risk their shekels, unlike how they came up.
I still love the moment of fear Mauler had after E;R threatened to debate him on ATLA after Rags had called it trash and gotten the rest of EFAP to back him on that.
Rags had never seen it beyond a handful of Youtube clips but did his normal "extreme hyperbole, everything I remotely don't like is literally objectively bad" (see also him missing crucial mechanics in REmake 2 and deciding it was garbage because of it).
So Mauler had to go "watch" it on his own with a completely unrelated guy, and decided (totally free of bias because he'd never take a position to protect his own guy) Rags was 100% right and it was terrible and that literally everyone was wrong.
Of course once they tried to buddy buddy with E;R, a basically untouchable name to most of their audience, that would make trouble.
Mauler, Rags, Drinker, etc. just aren't politics guys. They are media critics who dabble in culture war subjects, usually on the grounds that culture war is leading to shitty media politics, not even out of concern for public policy. They were never going to go anywhere politically useful. It's why the system doesn't care if they pile up millions of subscribers and views.
I don't know who any of these people are, but I do know how to spot the standard issue all lower case, no punctuation, irony-poisoned Twitter NPC model when I see one. So whatever he's talking about, he's wrong.
Drinker is the “diet” alternative critic. He acknowledges that the movie shits all over the established straight white male legacy character but goes on to call it brilliant anyways. The takeaway is that movies are apparently allowed to be blatantly anti-white as long as they are ostensibly “good”.
The whole EFAP crew is the same. They are disillusioned leftists who refuse to recognize that leftism is at the heart of our dysfunctional media. It’s honestly painful to watch sometimes. A bunch of supposedly insightful film critics complaining about the incompetence of writers and directors who are operating on pure ideology. You think feminists give a shit about plot holes or flat character arcs?
It was always gonna go downhill once Wolf left. He was a PoS in plenty of his own ways, but he was angry and autistic enough to call everyone, even his friends, on their shit. Its no surprise once he was off, Rags was able to run his mouth wantonly and every "debate" became a lot of dogpiling each other until you agreed with him.
And now that all of them are "established" they don't want to rock the boat too much and risk their shekels, unlike how they came up.
I still love the moment of fear Mauler had after E;R threatened to debate him on ATLA after Rags had called it trash and gotten the rest of EFAP to back him on that.
Its even worse than that.
Rags had never seen it beyond a handful of Youtube clips but did his normal "extreme hyperbole, everything I remotely don't like is literally objectively bad" (see also him missing crucial mechanics in REmake 2 and deciding it was garbage because of it).
So Mauler had to go "watch" it on his own with a completely unrelated guy, and decided (totally free of bias because he'd never take a position to protect his own guy) Rags was 100% right and it was terrible and that literally everyone was wrong.
Of course once they tried to buddy buddy with E;R, a basically untouchable name to most of their audience, that would make trouble.
E;R is untouchable period, like the ubermensch of video essayists. Nobody even dares to challenge him
Mauler, Rags, Drinker, etc. just aren't politics guys. They are media critics who dabble in culture war subjects, usually on the grounds that culture war is leading to shitty media politics, not even out of concern for public policy. They were never going to go anywhere politically useful. It's why the system doesn't care if they pile up millions of subscribers and views.
I think they know the truth, but they fear backlash and so they play along. They are smart enough to figure out the very obvious.
O'Hara did nothing wrong.
No shit. Course it's not like the people that made the damn film actually read any Spider-Man 2099
I don't know who any of these people are, but I do know how to spot the standard issue all lower case, no punctuation, irony-poisoned Twitter NPC model when I see one. So whatever he's talking about, he's wrong.