Imp approved literature or the future waiting for us all?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
He does go to extremes, his male genocide, fag loving and his incredible ability to link everything to feminism, but aside from those talking points, more often than not, he's right about what he's posting.
Ranting about how "women bad" isn't hard.
When he is met with "okay, and what do we do about it?" he can barely form a functional point other than "slavery and genocide and taxes for women!" Which makes him being right at times a pretty useless trait.
The ability to recognize a problem is easy. The ability to propose a solution that might work is vanishingly rare.
"Might" work is easy.
Want to reduce carbon emissions? Glass a major country. It "might" work. Ideas that "might" work are only useful in a thought experiment context. What is needed are ideas that very likely will work, but beyond that, far beyond that, is ideas that can be implemented. Nuking China into obsidian and shadows would 100% fix pretty much all environmentalists' concerns, straight-up. Every single complaint they make and concern they bring it WOULD be solved by it. It's beyond "very likely", it's nigh 100%. But it is a horrific, farcical solution that could never, and should never, be implemented...
...Unless of course the environmentalists are right and the world is doomed in but 6 years unless some ridiculous drastic steps are taken. Luckily they're just lying con artists.
If you can cut through the inane, delusional essays you might find something that provokes a "Huh" moment, mostly I just cruise on past imp posts because, well, they are usually the same old same old.
unironically, he needs to embrace 'intersectionality'
It's possible that most women in modern society are solipsistic and corrupt, AND that this was pushed by the university system and the frankfurt schoolers, with it being a core goal of marxist subversives....
But he focuses so much on just one tree, he misses the forest. He's right that that tree is rotten, but it's not the root cause, nor is it the only rotten one.