So I was gone for a while and I was reading old posts that I missed because I'm autistic like that, and I came across this: https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/16b64Drlqr/nyt-with-a-top-tier-gaslight-cla/c/ (Archive)
Seeing as it was an Imp post, I went and actually skimmed the article looking for the bullshit, because there's pretty much always bullshit in anything this tranny posts... and you won't believe what I found in the middle!
The school also acknowledged that it had erred more specifically on the night Jack took his life, just hours after the classmate involved in the bullying was formally expelled. Instead of being supervised as he packed his belongings, the boy was permitted to participate in a drawn-out farewell that included a final run around campus and a group photograph. During the gathering, some students also made harsh comments about Jack, inaccurately blaming him for the boy’s expulsion.
Bolded the important parts for you. A guy started the rumors that eventually led to the victim's (Jack's) suicide, not a girl as Imp claimed and as the other commenters accepted without questioning.
I know it's unpleasant to try to read the overly verbose, pretentious garbage the NYT shits out, but for the love of everything that is holy, learn to skim.
And you, Imp - I must repeat my earlier recommendation: Touch grass, preferably after falling out of an aircraft without a parachute, you autistic retard. For fuck's sake. Now tell me how the ghost of Dworkin totally made him do it.
I can't believe I missed that part or I just thought it was referring to the victim because why would a bully be celebrated in such fashion? Also, probably that Imp had already stated it was a girl and I just took him for his word.
It's my fault in the end. I should know better.
Anyway, thanks for bringing this up. This guy truly is blinded by his hatred for women.
I was watching a lotus eaters clip yesterday, they said an outlet does this, think it was NYT where they will frontload it with all the woke, virtue signalling bullshit but then later after the initial paragraph, they become very factual about the story.
Think that's because leftists (and some on the right) have a short attention span so only check the initial part to confirm if it's 'with us or against us' and then stop reading while everyone else that continues gets the factual content.
Yeah, it's called burying the lede. But that's not the case here, really, because the lede wasn't who started the rumors, the article was just faggotry about the school "accepting responsibility" (by creating some useless positions and programs). It's just that Imp only read the title, his monomaniacal autistic brain made an assumption, posted about it, and everyone else ate it up without questioning. My problem is the last part, the NYT and TheImp both did as expected.
It's a shame because if they removed the retard from these articles they'd be so much better.
You're an absolute moron and your fake downvotes aren't going to make you right.
You can't have a rape story without a fucking rape "victim".
A woman has to have co-ordinated this because someone has to pose as the "victim"!
That's not true, you absolute buffoon.
You, TheImp raped Kathy Bates which drover her into solitude.
There, I, a man, just spread a rape rumor about you without any woman's assistance and without a real woman to pose as anything.
Yes, but nobody in their right mind would believe it. That's my point. There has to be a victim, otherwise it's just a rumor that nobody would take seriously.
Has anyone been MeToo'd without a woman coming forward to make the accusations?
Jesus Christ you're retarded.
A girl made a rape accusation and her white knights led the bullying. It's fucking obvious.
You can't be so stupid as to believe a boy accused him of raping him and to believe the NYT when they don't say a girl was behind it is even more retarded.
Nobody, and I mean nobody, would believe a random rape story a boy starts.
And this is where you are wrong
How so? How can a rape story exist without a victim?
I refuse to believe anyone would believe crap like that.
Only a fucking moron would believe an unsourced accusation without a "victim" even coming forward. I suppose that explains OP, after all...stormfags are the biggest simps on earth.
The NYT praised Valerie Solanas, so...yeah. It definitely is possible that they are in on a huge lie.
"This monster raped one of my friends, who wants to remain anonymous, and who is still in shock and pain."
Just off the very top of my head. There's so many other ways, too, though. Just to show how numerous they are, here's a few more that immediately occur to me; you could start the rumor about a girl that recently transferred, graduated, or herself committed suicide...obviously due to the grief from [rumor target's] brutal raping of her. And it doesn't even have to be someone who's no longer at the school; you can start a rumor either vague, or about a specific girl and, even if she denies, the rumor is still out there, and many will think she just doesn't want it to be known that she was raped, or doesn't want to be a victim.
Hey look everyone, he said the thing!
Trannys are nothing if not predictable!
I knew you people were women's shills, but this is a new low.