As someone who has visited Japan, I found it just as shit as our culture tbh. The "based" Asian countries are like Thailand basically. Maybe signapore or Vietnam and Indonesia. Not Japan.
Sigh, yeah. A bunch of western media watching brainwashed morons just like over here. The older Japanese people have no clue what they're dealing with just like our worthless boomers. Same shit, different flavor.
For the most part it's degenerate filth. But there is a subgenre of rap that spreads based messages, and it can be useful way to expose fans of the genre to our side.
I'm not one, but I've been accused of being one because I said we should have let Japan dismember China. I'm not obsessed with Japan, I just think it's a civilized country that should have destroyed an uncivilized menace when it had the chance.
I had this thought when I was reading the anime post and l want to make a sort of "pilot" before I waste my time doing further research than what I've stumbled upon over my time of reading ESG reports.
Based Japan is a lie. People who think Japan is less bad than our culture either have a bizarre focus on race and "no black people in Japan lol" or they are massive weebs.
Allow me to explain
The systematically important financial institutions in Japan are :
Mitsubishi UFG
Mizuho Financial
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. (pictured)
Below them is Nomura Securities, which is considered only locally important. I won't be talking about them.
What's interesting about Japan's banks is that they are disproportionately woke compared to systematically important banks in other countries.
Both SMFG and MUFG are active in the US markets, dealing in ESG loans, particularly those around gender based hiring. Trimble Inc's loan based off reducing male hiring is secured by both institutions.
That's two out of only three institutions in Japan considered systematically important that are dealing heavily in ESG.
Even Australia has only Commonwealth Bank and Westpac engage in these, out of their four institutions.
I've been accused of weebery more than once and that's exactly why I'd read whatever you find out. Why would it make me mad? I was actually going to agree with you before when it comes to Japanese women, but it's difficult when you do your schtick of arguing generalities and ridiculously extremes like "Based Japan is a lie. People who think Japan is less bad than our culture either have a bizarre focus on race..." - There are degrees of "basedness" on various issues, and some things we call Based you call TERFism.
I thought about this even before this post, while watching recent videos discussing the LGBTQ law in Japan (including that Fox & Friends interview posted here) and reading the comments from Japanese people. I collected several of them and was thinking of posting a collage here because these Japanese are absolutely based, more so than Americans. Some of the comments wouldn't even be allowed if they were in English. It was refreshing and kind of a white pill.
That said, going through them there was an annoying streak of "protect the womenfolk" throughout, particularly when it comes to the bathroom issue. A few were even like "What's wrong with lawmakers? Mixed bathrooms? At least mandate bathrooms for Female AND Mixed." Outside the dying off ultra-nationalists, the conservative dialogue there seems stuck at the CPAC-level of "the Right needs to uplift women's voices!" It's far from the stereotype of macho right-wingers keeping women at home and out of politics. I don't see a beachhead to even start an anti-feminist dialogue with them on, but they don't have an analog to FOX News there so we take what we can get, no? I'm genuinely curious what you discover, though I don't have any interest in banking or finance so you'd have to make it easy to read otherwise.
I highly doubt the downvoter read the post in the time that took...God I'm sick of this.
You don't like my posts, post something useful. I'm the only one doing real research and putting real effort in, except for the guy who posts those huge lists of links.
I need to find a larger community if I want to make long-form posts and gain traction with them.
People have a finite amount of time, and not everyone is as content to sit on the internet day after day after day pretending to do politics as you are. Effort posts usually require effort on the readers as well as the authors. I don't think many people are going to invest much effort into reading your stuff because we all know what the conclusion will be regardless of how weak the evidence is. We also know you don't have an overall coherent world view.
On this subject in particular, you are digging into global finance capital. I've known for years that it is the source of so much rot. All you are doing is fleshing out some of the details. You also will pivot and circle the wagons to defend global finance capital on any subject other than feminism and tangential (according to your own warped logic) issues. You have no issue with it as a structure so your criticisms are hollow.
You also will pivot and circle the wagons to defend global finance capital on any subject other than feminism and tangential (according to your own warped logic) issues. You have no issue with it as a structure so your criticisms are hollow
So, because I don't want to tear the whole system down, I can't criticize it?
The only people who want to destroy the financial system entirely are lunatics. Valerie Solanas supported the idea.
You aren't in a position to judge anyone else's mental health, girl dick lover. Of course you would go with Solanas as representative of critics of finance capital and ignore that critics of things like usury range from Plato to Mohammed to hippy anarchist. Shit like this is why people don't waste their time with your nonsense.
If you love our current financial system so much, why are you such a miserable pile of shit? The system you love is winning.
Anyway, the reason I went with her is simple. If the feminist goal is to destroy the banking system, I must oppose that. Nothing good comes from them winning.
Also, as I said to the last "usury" idiot, interest is required to stop lending turning into a popularity contest.
As someone who has visited Japan, I found it just as shit as our culture tbh. The "based" Asian countries are like Thailand basically. Maybe signapore or Vietnam and Indonesia. Not Japan.
Sigh, yeah. A bunch of western media watching brainwashed morons just like over here. The older Japanese people have no clue what they're dealing with just like our worthless boomers. Same shit, different flavor.
That it is indeed. It's not even good music either.
For the most part it's degenerate filth. But there is a subgenre of rap that spreads based messages, and it can be useful way to expose fans of the genre to our side.
Are there weebs on this site?
Irrelevant, he just wants to create another level of victim complex for himself.
I'm not one, but I've been accused of being one because I said we should have let Japan dismember China. I'm not obsessed with Japan, I just think it's a civilized country that should have destroyed an uncivilized menace when it had the chance.
Yes.
I had this thought when I was reading the anime post and l want to make a sort of "pilot" before I waste my time doing further research than what I've stumbled upon over my time of reading ESG reports.
Based Japan is a lie. People who think Japan is less bad than our culture either have a bizarre focus on race and "no black people in Japan lol" or they are massive weebs.
Allow me to explain
The systematically important financial institutions in Japan are :
Mitsubishi UFG
Mizuho Financial
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. (pictured)
Below them is Nomura Securities, which is considered only locally important. I won't be talking about them.
What's interesting about Japan's banks is that they are disproportionately woke compared to systematically important banks in other countries.
Both SMFG and MUFG are active in the US markets, dealing in ESG loans, particularly those around gender based hiring. Trimble Inc's loan based off reducing male hiring is secured by both institutions.
That's two out of only three institutions in Japan considered systematically important that are dealing heavily in ESG.
Even Australia has only Commonwealth Bank and Westpac engage in these, out of their four institutions.
Is there enough interest for me to dig deeper?
I've been accused of weebery more than once and that's exactly why I'd read whatever you find out. Why would it make me mad? I was actually going to agree with you before when it comes to Japanese women, but it's difficult when you do your schtick of arguing generalities and ridiculously extremes like "Based Japan is a lie. People who think Japan is less bad than our culture either have a bizarre focus on race..." - There are degrees of "basedness" on various issues, and some things we call Based you call TERFism.
I thought about this even before this post, while watching recent videos discussing the LGBTQ law in Japan (including that Fox & Friends interview posted here) and reading the comments from Japanese people. I collected several of them and was thinking of posting a collage here because these Japanese are absolutely based, more so than Americans. Some of the comments wouldn't even be allowed if they were in English. It was refreshing and kind of a white pill.
That said, going through them there was an annoying streak of "protect the womenfolk" throughout, particularly when it comes to the bathroom issue. A few were even like "What's wrong with lawmakers? Mixed bathrooms? At least mandate bathrooms for Female AND Mixed." Outside the dying off ultra-nationalists, the conservative dialogue there seems stuck at the CPAC-level of "the Right needs to uplift women's voices!" It's far from the stereotype of macho right-wingers keeping women at home and out of politics. I don't see a beachhead to even start an anti-feminist dialogue with them on, but they don't have an analog to FOX News there so we take what we can get, no? I'm genuinely curious what you discover, though I don't have any interest in banking or finance so you'd have to make it easy to read otherwise.
I highly doubt the downvoter read the post in the time that took...God I'm sick of this.
You don't like my posts, post something useful. I'm the only one doing real research and putting real effort in, except for the guy who posts those huge lists of links.
They had time to read your whiny title.
I don't understand how it's whiny. It's just a cheap shot at people obsessed with Japan here.
If the title was in a vacuum I'd agree but I consider it in the context of your broader "work"
You said the weebs were going to get mad. You got what you always wanted.
It's just a funny title. I could just title it dryly "The Japanese obsession with ESG", but I like fun titles.
I just feel like if I'm going to put effort into researching things, it's only worth it if it is something people will actually read.
I feel like I've hit a wall here sometimes, that I need to find a larger community if I want to make long-form posts and gain traction with them.
The best way, I think, will be to post samples of the general framework and premise, see how people like it, then undertake the effort.
What was your first clue?
People have a finite amount of time, and not everyone is as content to sit on the internet day after day after day pretending to do politics as you are. Effort posts usually require effort on the readers as well as the authors. I don't think many people are going to invest much effort into reading your stuff because we all know what the conclusion will be regardless of how weak the evidence is. We also know you don't have an overall coherent world view.
On this subject in particular, you are digging into global finance capital. I've known for years that it is the source of so much rot. All you are doing is fleshing out some of the details. You also will pivot and circle the wagons to defend global finance capital on any subject other than feminism and tangential (according to your own warped logic) issues. You have no issue with it as a structure so your criticisms are hollow.
So, because I don't want to tear the whole system down, I can't criticize it?
The only people who want to destroy the financial system entirely are lunatics. Valerie Solanas supported the idea.
You aren't in a position to judge anyone else's mental health, girl dick lover. Of course you would go with Solanas as representative of critics of finance capital and ignore that critics of things like usury range from Plato to Mohammed to hippy anarchist. Shit like this is why people don't waste their time with your nonsense.
If you love our current financial system so much, why are you such a miserable pile of shit? The system you love is winning.
She was literally committed to an asylum.
Anyway, the reason I went with her is simple. If the feminist goal is to destroy the banking system, I must oppose that. Nothing good comes from them winning.
Also, as I said to the last "usury" idiot, interest is required to stop lending turning into a popularity contest.
Good news! It's not, you fucking idiot. That's where their funding comes from.
You could do loans on flat fees.