I need to find a larger community if I want to make long-form posts and gain traction with them.
People have a finite amount of time, and not everyone is as content to sit on the internet day after day after day pretending to do politics as you are. Effort posts usually require effort on the readers as well as the authors. I don't think many people are going to invest much effort into reading your stuff because we all know what the conclusion will be regardless of how weak the evidence is. We also know you don't have an overall coherent world view.
On this subject in particular, you are digging into global finance capital. I've known for years that it is the source of so much rot. All you are doing is fleshing out some of the details. You also will pivot and circle the wagons to defend global finance capital on any subject other than feminism and tangential (according to your own warped logic) issues. You have no issue with it as a structure so your criticisms are hollow.
You also will pivot and circle the wagons to defend global finance capital on any subject other than feminism and tangential (according to your own warped logic) issues. You have no issue with it as a structure so your criticisms are hollow
So, because I don't want to tear the whole system down, I can't criticize it?
The only people who want to destroy the financial system entirely are lunatics. Valerie Solanas supported the idea.
You aren't in a position to judge anyone else's mental health, girl dick lover. Of course you would go with Solanas as representative of critics of finance capital and ignore that critics of things like usury range from Plato to Mohammed to hippy anarchist. Shit like this is why people don't waste their time with your nonsense.
If you love our current financial system so much, why are you such a miserable pile of shit? The system you love is winning.
You said the weebs were going to get mad. You got what you always wanted.
It's just a funny title. I could just title it dryly "The Japanese obsession with ESG", but I like fun titles.
I just feel like if I'm going to put effort into researching things, it's only worth it if it is something people will actually read.
I feel like I've hit a wall here sometimes, that I need to find a larger community if I want to make long-form posts and gain traction with them.
The best way, I think, will be to post samples of the general framework and premise, see how people like it, then undertake the effort.
What was your first clue?
People have a finite amount of time, and not everyone is as content to sit on the internet day after day after day pretending to do politics as you are. Effort posts usually require effort on the readers as well as the authors. I don't think many people are going to invest much effort into reading your stuff because we all know what the conclusion will be regardless of how weak the evidence is. We also know you don't have an overall coherent world view.
On this subject in particular, you are digging into global finance capital. I've known for years that it is the source of so much rot. All you are doing is fleshing out some of the details. You also will pivot and circle the wagons to defend global finance capital on any subject other than feminism and tangential (according to your own warped logic) issues. You have no issue with it as a structure so your criticisms are hollow.
So, because I don't want to tear the whole system down, I can't criticize it?
The only people who want to destroy the financial system entirely are lunatics. Valerie Solanas supported the idea.
You aren't in a position to judge anyone else's mental health, girl dick lover. Of course you would go with Solanas as representative of critics of finance capital and ignore that critics of things like usury range from Plato to Mohammed to hippy anarchist. Shit like this is why people don't waste their time with your nonsense.
If you love our current financial system so much, why are you such a miserable pile of shit? The system you love is winning.