Man, if we’re in a place where “banana up ass” and “hot oil on cock” can be openly described, there’s no way in hell I’m clicking a link that simply says “abomination” lol. That’s gotta be REALLY bad!
It was a weak attempt to "own it" instead of hiding in shame with that sword hanging over you in every conversation. Which, granted, is the only real option you have, but it doesn't undo the damage.
I wouldn't call it perfectly, but it worked enough for his supporters to continue to be his supporters openly.
Though given his place as the "shameless asshole" of the atheist movement, he really didn't have anywhere deeper to go and they were big on that "sex positive, all kink all the time" thing at the time.
Without bothering to look into it I'm going to assume it was meant to be some kind of 'own' of that 'atheist nightmare' video Kirk Cameron and that other guy made where they tried to explain how the banana was proof of God's design because of how perfectly ergonomic it is. "your god banana fits perfectly up my ass, take that, christianity!"
Yes because accuracy matters. Some people would call slapping a child child abuse. Others would say it's disciplining that kid for biting another kid. Same for shit like bumping into someone walking past in an elevator is "unwanted contact".
Again, I'm all for context, especially in situations like those. I don't think there's any way to contextualize putting a banana in your anal cavity that makes it normal though.
Usually I'm all for understanding the context of things but does it really matter what context in which you perform a sex act with a banana?
What if you just slipped on the peel and it fell in?
"A million to one shot, doc...a million to one!"
That explains the banana but what about the video he made of himself pouring hot oil onto his microdick? Or this abomination…
Man, if we’re in a place where “banana up ass” and “hot oil on cock” can be openly described, there’s no way in hell I’m clicking a link that simply says “abomination” lol. That’s gotta be REALLY bad!
I'm glad I never stumbled upon those.
It was a weak attempt to "own it" instead of hiding in shame with that sword hanging over you in every conversation. Which, granted, is the only real option you have, but it doesn't undo the damage.
By all accounts it worked perfectly and he faced no downsides or consequences of any kind.
I wouldn't call it perfectly, but it worked enough for his supporters to continue to be his supporters openly.
Though given his place as the "shameless asshole" of the atheist movement, he really didn't have anywhere deeper to go and they were big on that "sex positive, all kink all the time" thing at the time.
Without bothering to look into it I'm going to assume it was meant to be some kind of 'own' of that 'atheist nightmare' video Kirk Cameron and that other guy made where they tried to explain how the banana was proof of God's design because of how perfectly ergonomic it is. "your god banana fits perfectly up my ass, take that, christianity!"
Yes because accuracy matters. Some people would call slapping a child child abuse. Others would say it's disciplining that kid for biting another kid. Same for shit like bumping into someone walking past in an elevator is "unwanted contact".
Again, I'm all for context, especially in situations like those. I don't think there's any way to contextualize putting a banana in your anal cavity that makes it normal though.
And film it, and distribute it.