Yeah they wouldn't have let him air the thing they really didn't want him saying.
Which is why he was fired in this PR disaster way with no leaks or warning. They said "don't air this thing or else" he said "well I'm going to do it" and they said "you're fired!" because that's the only way they could stop him from airing it.
This is what got him fired, I don't care what that law suit that one lady is bringing to court.
The current rumor is that it was over him wanting to air a segment demolishing the Ray Epps/60 Minutes thing.
Yeah they wouldn't have let him air the thing they really didn't want him saying.
Which is why he was fired in this PR disaster way with no leaks or warning. They said "don't air this thing or else" he said "well I'm going to do it" and they said "you're fired!" because that's the only way they could stop him from airing it.
what reason could they possibly have to protect epps?
did someone from the government tell them to?
We don't know yet why he was fired.
If it was re Epps it's because the Jan 6 narrative is a big hurdle for Trump and Fox/Murdoch will do anything to stop Trump.
But it could have been Epstein related or lots of other things.
He basically got O'keefe'd. Not surprising.
And who owns big pharma? Hmm.
To be fair, what has O'Keefe done since then? Simp for female murderers.