Destroying men's spaces was essential to the regime because all political opposition emerges from groups of men getting together, bitching and moaning until they get pissed off enough to muster a response.
But the way this always plays out is feminists say men and women are different when it's convenient for women, then when it's inconvenient, they say they're exactly the same and must be treated the same, and the right keeps going along with it.
Example:
Men outnumber women getting computer science degrees? Better establish a boatload of gender-specific scholarships and programs and discriminatory hiring practices and a million other things to get more women into that field regardless of their interest or qualifications.
Women outnumber men in most non-STEM fields, and outnumber men in college in general nearly 2 to 1, and the ratio gets more extreme every year? LOL, that's because men are dumb, more scholarships for women.
So know that if you support this sort of thing, it will never be matched by an equivalent support for men in any other part of society, even if they demonstrably have a greater need for assistance.
So know that if you support this sort of thing, it will never be matched by an equivalent support for men in any other part of society, even if they demonstrably have a greater need for assistance.
And that's every special interest group. They never want the equality they are claiming. They simply want to eliminate any real or perceived disadvantages their group has while retaining any advantages and privileges.
Which is how you get a feminist screaming that women are equal and should be eligible for all the jobs in the military in one sentence, immediately followed by a statement that it's wrong to expand the draft to women.
Maybe, but personally I'm certainly opposed to the framing.
"It's not discrimination, we're just giving specifically women stuff!" says that commenter. Maybe it's warranted, maybe it's not, but let's not beat around the bush here. Women are being given preferential treatment, and the people cheering it on are acting like that's not true, and trying to dunk on the "angry men" at the same time.
So, for the sake of argument, let's say the policy is sound. These people are still being vicious and entitled shallow narcissists.
Destroying men's spaces was essential to the regime because all political opposition emerges from groups of men getting together, bitching and moaning until they get pissed off enough to muster a response.
While all troons should die, I sit back and drink mint juleps when I hear about women spaces getting invaded by "chicks" with dicks.
Here here. Spoken like a true nationalist.
And that's why, if you did manage to start a little group, probably one out of every five of them would be an FBI informant.
But the way this always plays out is feminists say men and women are different when it's convenient for women, then when it's inconvenient, they say they're exactly the same and must be treated the same, and the right keeps going along with it.
Example: Men outnumber women getting computer science degrees? Better establish a boatload of gender-specific scholarships and programs and discriminatory hiring practices and a million other things to get more women into that field regardless of their interest or qualifications.
Women outnumber men in most non-STEM fields, and outnumber men in college in general nearly 2 to 1, and the ratio gets more extreme every year? LOL, that's because men are dumb, more scholarships for women.
So know that if you support this sort of thing, it will never be matched by an equivalent support for men in any other part of society, even if they demonstrably have a greater need for assistance.
And that's every special interest group. They never want the equality they are claiming. They simply want to eliminate any real or perceived disadvantages their group has while retaining any advantages and privileges.
Which is how you get a feminist screaming that women are equal and should be eligible for all the jobs in the military in one sentence, immediately followed by a statement that it's wrong to expand the draft to women.
Maybe, but personally I'm certainly opposed to the framing.
"It's not discrimination, we're just giving specifically women stuff!" says that commenter. Maybe it's warranted, maybe it's not, but let's not beat around the bush here. Women are being given preferential treatment, and the people cheering it on are acting like that's not true, and trying to dunk on the "angry men" at the same time.
So, for the sake of argument, let's say the policy is sound. These people are still being vicious and entitled shallow narcissists.
They'll just claim male only spaces are hotbeds of rape and demand inclusion to keep us in line