practically speaking, I don't really mind if there are restrictions on it in terms of time. I think Florida's 6 weeks is too aggressive because irresponsible women won't act quickly enough. somewhere in the 8-12 week range is where I think the bulk of the Republican party should be.
my real answer if I were God-King: it depends on who is getting aborted. I would have statistical risk charts based on the most detailed data possible in order to "score" the potential life based on its odds of being a net gain or net negative to society. High score good babies = abortion totally illegal & banned. Low score bad babies likely to do things like crime or BLM riots or be stupid or disabled or vote Democrat = abortion highly encouraged or even mandated.
my view on abortion is identical to my view on immigration: policy should be 100% based on what is best for those of us who are already here, with 0 weight placed on the interests of the immigrant.
but that's eugenics
thank you for noticing. I've been a supporter of eugenics since I did a science project on it as a child. I've never understood how it can be legal for 2 retards to fuck & make a retard baby, just because society is too spineless to sterilize women who have serious genetic diseases. there are lots of people who should be required to accept sterilization as a condition of receiving government welfare payments.
Yes. I believe abortion is a moral wrong, but I believe it's probably a net positive.
Something like 12 weeks works for me. 6 weeks--or none--will destroy the Republican party for the foreseeable future.
I've always found it ironic. One of my lefty friends who had pro-abortion bumper stickers on her car has a child with a genetic disease. She chose not to abort, and she and her husband are totally devoted to their kid who has serious, lifelong, issues. I am morally opposed to abortion, and I thankfully have never been in her position, but I would have aborted.
OTOH, the problem with eugenics is, who gets to decide?
OTOH, the problem with eugenics is, who gets to decide
Unfortunately, that's the problem with so many things. I'm a firm believer that problematic politicians, judges, prosecutors, and police should simply be murdered extrajudicially, but once that genie is out of the bottle I can guarantee that people simply angry about going to jail will be committing as many or more murders than the righteous.
Likewise, voting. Most people don't deserve a vote, and should basically be enslaved for the good of humanity. Free will and self-determination should be left to their more intelligent and more ethical betters. But if we ever enacted something like that, it would immediately be weaponized to oppress people based on attributes that have nothing to do with why the system was put in place
My brother said something similar about welfare. Guys who have kids that they aren’t taking care of should get a mandatory vasectomy and he thinks women who have kids they don’t support should have their tubes tied
why I support abortion
Out of curiosity, do you support it in all phases or up to a certain point?
practically speaking, I don't really mind if there are restrictions on it in terms of time. I think Florida's 6 weeks is too aggressive because irresponsible women won't act quickly enough. somewhere in the 8-12 week range is where I think the bulk of the Republican party should be.
my real answer if I were God-King: it depends on who is getting aborted. I would have statistical risk charts based on the most detailed data possible in order to "score" the potential life based on its odds of being a net gain or net negative to society. High score good babies = abortion totally illegal & banned. Low score bad babies likely to do things like crime or BLM riots or be stupid or disabled or vote Democrat = abortion highly encouraged or even mandated.
my view on abortion is identical to my view on immigration: policy should be 100% based on what is best for those of us who are already here, with 0 weight placed on the interests of the immigrant.
thank you for noticing. I've been a supporter of eugenics since I did a science project on it as a child. I've never understood how it can be legal for 2 retards to fuck & make a retard baby, just because society is too spineless to sterilize women who have serious genetic diseases. there are lots of people who should be required to accept sterilization as a condition of receiving government welfare payments.
Yes. I believe abortion is a moral wrong, but I believe it's probably a net positive.
Something like 12 weeks works for me. 6 weeks--or none--will destroy the Republican party for the foreseeable future.
I've always found it ironic. One of my lefty friends who had pro-abortion bumper stickers on her car has a child with a genetic disease. She chose not to abort, and she and her husband are totally devoted to their kid who has serious, lifelong, issues. I am morally opposed to abortion, and I thankfully have never been in her position, but I would have aborted.
OTOH, the problem with eugenics is, who gets to decide?
Unfortunately, that's the problem with so many things. I'm a firm believer that problematic politicians, judges, prosecutors, and police should simply be murdered extrajudicially, but once that genie is out of the bottle I can guarantee that people simply angry about going to jail will be committing as many or more murders than the righteous.
Likewise, voting. Most people don't deserve a vote, and should basically be enslaved for the good of humanity. Free will and self-determination should be left to their more intelligent and more ethical betters. But if we ever enacted something like that, it would immediately be weaponized to oppress people based on attributes that have nothing to do with why the system was put in place
I'm only ok with it as long as it's me who decides. LOL. That's why I said "God Emperor" version.
I would never trust our incompetent, corrupt government to decide. I don't trust them with anything except how to rig things to benefit the democrats.
My brother said something similar about welfare. Guys who have kids that they aren’t taking care of should get a mandatory vasectomy and he thinks women who have kids they don’t support should have their tubes tied
Yes, if only she had access to abortions in- San Francisco- this tragedy could have been avoided.
That woman is the product of a lifetime of bad decisions. At some point society should cut their losses and cast them out from society.