The justification for keeping them separate would be to protect women from rape, but since they're kids, the boys aren't actually capable of rape, so therefore it's an invalid argument for sex segregation.
But it's a moot point because I'm pretty sure they allow boys already.
Huh?
Allow me to try to translate:
The justification for keeping them separate would be to protect women from rape, but since they're kids, the boys aren't actually capable of rape, so therefore it's an invalid argument for sex segregation.
But it's a moot point because I'm pretty sure they allow boys already.