Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

39
Harvard's 'Are You A Bigot?!?!' Test (implicit.harvard.edu)
posted 3 years ago by LastRights 3 years ago by LastRights +39 / -0
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 26 ▼
– Smith1980 26 points 3 years ago +26 / -0

Aren’t these tests rigged to show that everyone is super racist? At least the ones I’ve seen

permalink save report block reply
▲ 33 ▼
– Ahaus667 33 points 3 years ago +33 / -0

Basically, they use psychological tricks that have been common in marketing and commercials to create association biases. Even most black people get slight white bias on these because that’s how they’re designed. The original creators even admitted the thing was completely useless in determining actual biases it was just a “starting a conversation” tool…

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Smith1980 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

The correct conversation of course

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– NoEyesNoGroin 23 points 3 years ago +23 / -0

Implicit bias tests are a pseudoscience. This shouldn't surprise anyone who is metascientifically knowledgeable, because big, decades-long pseudoscientific lumps of shit like it are common in the "sciences". In fact, about two thirds of medicine, psychology, and many other fields are irreproducible trash. And, if that wasn't bad enough, that irreproducible trash is easy even for a layman to quickly identify, which means most of the scientists in these fields are either corrupt or braindead or some combination of the two.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Sneak_King 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

That layman link is mind boggling. Thanks for posting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Smith1980 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I completely agree. It’s just ridiculous how seriously they are taken.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Adamrises 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

All "personality" type tests are designed to lead to the conclusion they want. We were taught back in like sophmore year of the undergrad how much effort you have to put in to dodge biases and self fulfillment, which probably 90% of the class failed at over and over and just passed regardless with a "now you know for the future!" message.

One of those lessons was to mislead the test taker on the purpose of the test, so avoid them figuring out what you are doing and then lying. Because if you think you'll look like a bad person, you'll give different answers.

Every one of these tests fail that very basic criteria, including basically every poll or political compass test. Especially as, none of these people are going to put in the aforementioned effort to avoid those problems because that would require a high mastery of the English language and a lot of redrafting after fake attempts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Smith1980 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

No surprise at all.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– captain-shitpost 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

they are trying to recreate the concept of original sin... that everyone is racist/sexist/*phobic, and that the only way to atone is to be subservient to them and their demands.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– cosmicspiritwarrior 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It told me I have a small tendency to have an automatic bias for john f Kennedy over biden.

i'm like, well DUH>

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Smith1980 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The current senator of president?

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy