Im sorry, are you now saying posting the information from the article you listed is now “pivoting the conversation”? Did the anti circumcision article you link not quote John money and admit that even trivial medical procedure like a booster shot could cause trauma?

Physiologic studies indicate that very early pain or stress experiences have more than immediate consequences for infants.

Now prove a fever has any less trauma induced than a circumcision, your argument is that any pain or stress can cause harm. Notice how she isn’t screaming OMGS CIRCUMCISIONS GUARANTEE LIFELONG HARM.

Premature human infants and sick newborns, given their typical experiences, are subjected to multiple procedures including heel lancing, intravenous catheter insertion, chest tube insertion, endotracheal tube suctioning, and surgery. Indeed, a longitudinal study showed that the youngest preterm neonates undergo an average of 750 procedures during their hospital stay

Sorry where did she list circumcision?

Pain is difficult to assess and even more challenging when its victims are very young or preverbal. This is especially true of newborn infants, either full or preterm. For years, health-care practitioners in the United States have cared for infants without viewing pain as one of the significant risks or disadvantages in making treatment decisions. This was not because anyone wanted to hurt babies.

Oh this paper is arguing for pain management and anesthesia, not the stoppage of any medical procedure on infants?

Do you even bother reading the papers dumbass? Would you be okay with a circumcision if they had pain management and anesthesia? Or is a circumcision being performed with anesthesia LIKE EVERY MEDICAL PROCEDURE ON INFANTS somehow only circumcisions fault?