“I don’t have an answer so I’m going to repeat the same line”. It’s not a ridiculous example it’s a direct comparison, both are completely benign surgeries with no long term complications, in fact there’s proven health benefits to circumcision over removing a non functional penis nodule. Please go on though!
In another similar study, it was found that painful procedures in the neonatal period were associated with site-specific changes in the brain that have been found to be associated with mood disorders
Not just circumcisions, as I said before, this argument can be made for literally any condition that causes an infant pain, you can make the same claim for a fucking fever.
Over the last decade there has been a movement of men who were circumcised as infants and have articulated their anger and sadness over having their genitals modified without their consent. Goldman (1999) notes that shame and denial is one major factor that limits the number of men who publicly express this belief. Studies of men who were circumcised in infancy have found that some men experienced symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder, depression, anger, and intimacy problems that were directly associated with feelings about their circumcision (Boyle, 2002; Goldman, 1999; Hammond, 1999).
This isn’t due to the circumcision but how the “man” emotionally reacts…
The CDC fails to consider that many medical procedures, even those that are described as routine, are often experienced as traumatic by children and adolescents
Again, literally any procedure can cause this. Same as a tetanus shot or booster…
The psychological consequences of medical procedures are even greater when they involve a child’s genitals. Studies have examined the psychological effects of medical photography of the genitals (Money, 1987), repeated genital examinations (Money, 1987)
You’re using the pedophile John Moneys studies as an argument for not circumcising.
Did you even bother reading it or just grabbed the first link you saw? These claims are no different that Freuds oedipus nonsense…
“I don’t have an answer so I’m going to repeat the same line”. It’s not a ridiculous example it’s a direct comparison, both are completely benign surgeries with no long term complications, in fact there’s proven health benefits to circumcision over removing a non functional penis nodule. Please go on though!
That’s adorable! Tell you what, when you can prove the repeated studies over decades that show better health in circumcised men were wrong we’ll talk.
Yes it’s called being able to back up my argument, unlike you.
Saying it should be up to the parent’s discretion and there’s a legitimate medical purpose= gaslighting. This is just libtard levels of coping
Not just circumcisions, as I said before, this argument can be made for literally any condition that causes an infant pain, you can make the same claim for a fucking fever.
This isn’t due to the circumcision but how the “man” emotionally reacts…
Again, literally any procedure can cause this. Same as a tetanus shot or booster…
You’re using the pedophile John Moneys studies as an argument for not circumcising.
Did you even bother reading it or just grabbed the first link you saw? These claims are no different that Freuds oedipus nonsense…